We performed a comparison between Bitdefender GravityZone EDR and Fortinet FortiClient based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It notifies us if there's any suspicious file on any PC. If any execution or similar kind of thing is happening, it just alerts us. It doesn't only alert. It also blocks the execution until we allow it. We check whether the execution is legitimate or not, and then approve it or keep it blocked. This gives us a little bit of control over this mechanism. Fortinet FortiEDR is also very straightforward and easy to maintain."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"This is stable and scalable."
"The price is low and quite competitive with others."
"It's easy to deploy."
"I have found Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra to be highly scalable."
"It efficiently investigates security incidents."
"With Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra, we don't have to worry about our endpoints or attacks. Our security has become stronger. This has been a reliable solution for our company."
"It is easy to scale and it is suitable for organizations from small businesses to enterprise."
"The most valuable feature for me is the ability to whitelist, blacklist, and be very granular as to what I blocked, what apps I blocked, and what websites I block. I think that's probably the most valuable feature."
"The advantage of the solution is that it has a console on the cloud and you can update the clients."
"The features that are most useful are the simplicity of deploying the package and the cryptosystem for managing all the situations on the computer."
"When the user gets authenticated, I can assign a different VPN or network to each user."
"This is a solid and stable solution."
"It is a fantastic product. Its overall security is valuable. We are very impressed with the web filtering and the application firewall it provides."
"Secure and easy connect is the most valuable feature. It is a reliable solution, and it works."
"From my perspective as an end user, it's consistently stable, and I would rate the stability as a nine out of ten."
"I find it very easy to configure and also very stable."
"The VPN connection is the feature that I like the most."
"The service is centralized."
"The solution is not stable."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"They can include the automation for the realtime updates. We have a network infrastructure with remote sites. Whenever they send updates, they are not automated. We have to go into the console and push those updates. I wish it was more automated. The update file is currently around 31 MB. It could be smaller."
"FortiEDR could add a separate scanning dashboard. In incident management, we prefer to remove the endpoint system from the environment and scan the system. We typically use Symantec for that, but if we want to use FortiEDR for that, then we need a scanning tab to clarify things."
"We've had a lot of false positives; things incorrectly flagged that require manual configuration to allow. Even worse, after we allow a legitimate program, it sometimes gets flagged again after an update. This has caused a lot of extra work for my team."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"There's room for improvement in terms of protection. That's my primary concern."
"The areas of Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and Extended Detection and Response (XDR) could benefit from improvement in terms of how problems are reported and displayed. The way the problems are presented and the information provided could be improved."
"Their ransomware remediation doesn't respond as fast as BullWall does...Ransomware control needs to be improved."
"In terms of improvement of the solution, it could have better features. For example, having a firewall within. This way we would only need one solution."
"Bitdefender GravityZone EDR doesn't have an official office in Saudi Arabia, which is important if the vendor wants to gain or be closer to their customers."
"They should include the Hebrew language for its technical support in terms of communication."
"While the solution is secure, it could have better integration."
"The main area for improvement is the dashboard of the cloud console, where we manage security policies and groupings. It needs to be more flexible and informative."
"While I cannot think of new features to add, it would be nice if the reports were improved, to have these sent automatically."
"While we like patch management, it would be nice if it could handle patch management for other solutions, like Microsoft."
"The connectivity could be improved."
"Technical support needs to determine priority level based on the cases rather than the support package bundle."
"The initial setup was probably more complex. The configuration was somewhat unclear."
"Compatibility issues between different versions."
"We'd like to see a deployment wizard to help implementation become streamlined."
"The solution should have faster turnaround when it comes to new technology."
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is ranked 14th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 56 reviews while Fortinet FortiClient is ranked 15th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 85 reviews. Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is rated 8.6, while Fortinet FortiClient is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Bitdefender GravityZone EDR writes "High-quality threat intelligence, including encryption and mobile device protection". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiClient writes "Easy to set up and user-friendly with good support ". Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, CrowdStrike Falcon, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Fortinet FortiClient is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business and Ivanti Connect Secure. See our Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs. Fortinet FortiClient report.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.