We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and Confluent based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Microsoft, Oracle and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)."It's very user-friendly and designed to be easy to use for the end user."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"The iPaaS functionality is very mature. The browser based IDE is also very mature and stable."
"The product's integration features are quite rich and low code. It is easy to use."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is stable."
"I really appreciate the on-the-go access through the browser and the B2B integration."
"It is easy to learn and implement."
"The Salesforce and NetSuite Application specific “connectors” provide a layer of abstraction on top of the SOAP-based APIs to streamline integration development."
"With Confluent Cloud we no longer need to handle the infrastructure and the plumbing, which is a concern for Confluent. The other advantage is that all portfolios have access to the data that is being shared."
"We mostly use the solution's message queues and event-driven architecture."
"Confluence's greatest asset is its user-friendly interface, coupled with its remarkable ability to seamlessly integrate with a vast range of other solutions."
"Their tech support is amazing; they are very good, both on and off-site."
"It is also good for knowledge base management."
"The most valuable is its capability to enhance the documentation process, particularly when creating software documentation."
"The design of the product is extremely well built and it is highly configurable."
"The monitoring module is impressive."
"In day-to-day operations, tracking transactions is a major challenge. It takes hours to track a single transaction. It is not a straightforward process."
"There is no validation in the mapping profile custom scripting, such as IntelliSense or advanced error checking."
"The product's UI could be more convenient."
"There are very few string handling functions and few mathematical functions are available."
"The product could be a little bit more user-friendly."
"We encountered stability issues occasionally, one to two times a year."
"They should create a custom connector option. With this, they could improve where the user can create the connector, based on their usage."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"It could be improved by including a feature that automatically creates a new topic and puts failed messages."
"It could have more integration with different platforms."
"The formatting aspect within the page can be improved and more powerful."
"In Confluent, there could be a few more VPN options."
"there is room for improvement in the visualization."
"The product should integrate tools for incorporating diagrams like Lucidchart. It also needs to improve its formatting features. We also faced issues while granting permissions."
"Confluence could improve the server version of the solution. However, most companies are going to the cloud."
"There is a limitation when it comes to seamlessly importing Microsoft documents into Confluent pages, which can be inconvenient for users who frequently work with Microsoft Office tools and need to transition their content to Confluent."
Boomi iPaaS is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Confluent is ranked 4th in Streaming Analytics with 19 reviews. Boomi iPaaS is rated 7.8, while Confluent is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Boomi iPaaS writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Confluent writes "Has good technical support services and a valuable feature for real-time data streaming ". Boomi iPaaS is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, SSIS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and AWS Glue, whereas Confluent is most compared with Amazon MSK, Amazon Kinesis, Databricks, AWS Glue and Oracle GoldenGate.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
