We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and Oracle Integration Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I have found the solution to be scalable."
"It is easy to learn and implement."
"I like the tool's optimization feature."
"Extremely flexible for any kind of integration between systems."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is stable."
"This is a fairly easy-to-use tool for integration which can be self-taught for those with a bit of a technical background."
"The solution has a lot of connectors, which is quite helpful."
"The Salesforce and NetSuite Application specific “connectors” provide a layer of abstraction on top of the SOAP-based APIs to streamline integration development."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Integration Cloud Service is its performance."
"The most important part would be the use of connectors. The significant number of cloud connectors available for active integration is its value."
"OIC's accuracy is quite good."
"Technical support responds quickly."
"The most valuable features of Oracle Integration Cloud Service are the seeded integrations with many communication platforms, such as Slack and emails. It works best for the historical communication methods. Those are still prevalent with all the other clients. When we are doing the integrations, it makes it a little bit easier for us to communicate the same output over Slack, rather than sending out an email and downloading the report. The number of seeded functionalities within the Oracle Integration Cloud Service platform is better."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Integration Cloud Service is its ease of use. We do not depend on any tool to develop it. Everything is on the browser and is easy to integrate, even for someone who does not understand a lot about coding."
"The lack of features in something like Oracle Integration Cloud leaves some room for leads implementation partners like us"
"The dashboard provided by Oracle Integration Cloud for monitoring and error handling is very intuitive."
"They are lacking in some streaming features, and messaging features from a listener's point of view."
"We encountered stability issues occasionally, one to two times a year."
"There is no validation in the mapping profile custom scripting, such as IntelliSense or advanced error checking."
"There are still some areas that need improvement. For example, when updates are going on, the product becomes very slow."
"The product's UI could be more convenient."
"They need to introduce more configurable functions to remove scripting or coding. Scripting should be minimized. It should have exhaustive functions. Currently, it lacks in this aspect."
"Lots of enhancements are needed in the API portal so that the developers can view the definitions, try out the APIs, etc."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration should scale up on the migration area."
"The error retrying mechanism could be improved. If an error occurs, it can be retried automatically, it would be helpful."
"It would be helpful if there were more tutorials or documentation to learn about Oracle Integration Cloud Service."
"Now the platform is not built in a way that you can define."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service can improve the downloading and uploading of files. I've submitted this issue to the Oracle Idea Labs. The issue is from the front end of Oracle Integration Cloud, we cannot download or upload a file directly or drag and drop it."
"Our client was quite concerned about the cost, which is something that could be reduced."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service can improve file handling. Currently, our real-time file polling limitation is 10 MB, if that size can be increased it would be helpful. For example, increasing the size from 10 MB to 1 GB."
"In designer mode, sometimes the browser closure or other unknown issues can cause strange behavior, which requires a restart."
"While most of the adapters are available through Oracle Integration Cloud Services, they do not have a lot of features. I would like to see some enrichment in this area and for the solution to go deeper into the applications and upgrade the adapters."
More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Boomi iPaaS is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 3rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 32 reviews. Boomi iPaaS is rated 7.8, while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Boomi iPaaS writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain". Boomi iPaaS is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, SSIS, AWS Glue and Azure Data Factory, whereas Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), AWS Glue, Mule Anypoint Platform, Oracle GoldenGate and Workato. See our Boomi iPaaS vs. Oracle Integration Cloud Service report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.