We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This is a fairly easy-to-use tool for integration which can be self-taught for those with a bit of a technical background."
"The best features are that it is a cloud-based and a multi-tenant tool."
"The Salesforce and NetSuite Application specific “connectors” provide a layer of abstraction on top of the SOAP-based APIs to streamline integration development."
"Extremely flexible for any kind of integration between systems."
"AtomSphere Integration will suit those looking for small automation and simple integrations."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is stable."
"We work on the flow between systems and the most valuable features for that purpose are the mapping of data, interface mapping, and data integration."
"The connection configuration part and the drag-and-drop integration module are the most valuable features for me."
"The product has an ELT approach."
"Most of the functions are very straightforward, like the data model, mapping, package, and load plan. Thus, a new user could get started very fast."
"One of the standout features of ODI is its ability to prepare everything on a vertical level and create reusable components, which adds to its value."
"Easy to understand, very developer-friendly, and has a big forum community and lots of documentation for support."
"The installation of the client ODI Studio is easy."
"ODI's most valuable features are it utilizes the database engine and is very lightweight."
"The CAEM is very useful in its modularity and portability."
"It allows us to use many languages to develop and to integrate practically all the technologies of the Oracle suite as well as those from non-Oracle vendors."
"Have to create some of our own pre-built connectors."
"In my experience, I haven't encountered any major issues with the tool. However, there could be a learning curve for new users, especially depending on which tool you're using. For example, I've used MuleSoft in the past, which is more code-oriented and requires knowledge of Java. Transitioning to Boomi AtomSphere Integration took me a couple of months because of differences in terminology."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is not yet exposed to the world as a good product owing to certain shortcomings in the area of marketing where improvements are required."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration should scale up on the migration area."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The product's UI could be more convenient."
"Lots of enhancements are needed in the API portal so that the developers can view the definitions, try out the APIs, etc."
"There are very few string handling functions and few mathematical functions are available."
"The initial setup is a bit complex compared to other tools."
"The price needs to be lowered. It's too expensive."
"An area for improvement in Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is real-time integration. Currently, my company has a workaround to implement real-time integration, an area on which Oracle must focus more. Real-time integration should be easier in Oracle Data Integrator (ODI). Another area for improvement in Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is integration with more publishers and subscribers rather than just database integrations."
"ODI could improve by focusing on streamlining its features without unnecessary overhead."
"Overall the product is fine, but sometimes its reports unknown errors while we compile ETL scripts."
"The initial setup is complex, especially if you also have to install a console."
"Stability could be improved because some operators have issues."
"The resource management aspect of the solution could be improved."
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is ranked 4th in Data Integration with 67 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) writes "Straightforward to implement, scalable, and has good stability and documentation, but technical support could still be improved". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, SSIS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and Azure Data Factory, whereas Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is most compared with Oracle Integration Cloud Service, Informatica PowerCenter, SSIS, Azure Data Factory and Oracle GoldenGate. See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.