We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and Talend Open Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the tool's optimization feature."
"The best features are that it is a cloud-based and a multi-tenant tool."
"Very effective with its drag-and-drop feature."
"It has been a stable product."
"The platform is user-friendly."
"AtomSphere Integration will suit those looking for small automation and simple integrations."
"The iPaaS functionality is very mature. The browser based IDE is also very mature and stable."
"We work on the flow between systems and the most valuable features for that purpose are the mapping of data, interface mapping, and data integration."
"The most valuable features are the ETL tools."
"This product is very easy to use."
"Talend can connect to multiple data sources, including relational data sources, ERP, CRM, and others."
"Talend Studio has the ability to use it to ensure data quality."
"The main differentiator that I have seen between Talend and other data integration tools is the ability to view the data pipeline in the form of a program."
"It is user-friendly and the interface is good."
"The drag-and-drop feature in the interface is very good."
"Open Studio's best features are that it's user-friendly, even for beginners, and very easy to implement."
"The API can use some work to come up to speed with the competition but Dell has plans and is working on resolving that."
"Documentation could be improved."
"We would like to see more involvement between Dell Boomi and the end-users to help improve the customer experience."
"There is no validation in the mapping profile custom scripting, such as IntelliSense or advanced error checking."
"We encountered stability issues occasionally, one to two times a year."
"It is a costly platform. Its pricing could be better."
"Have to create some of our own pre-built connectors."
"The solution is complex. There's a few items and features that are hard to understand. They should work to simplify the functionality so new users don't struggle."
"The pricing could be lower. They should work to make it more affordable."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"It is not as visually appealing as some of the other tools."
"The profiling perspective needs improvement. Instead of using it in the studio, we are using a different tool which is also provided by Talend. It's redundant."
"Technical support and customer service need to be improved."
"If I compare Open Studion to other solutions, their interface is robust but not so fancy looking. This is an area that could use improvement. I would like to see an updated interface."
"The security features could be improved."
"In the next release, Open Studio should include cloud storage as an input."
Boomi iPaaS is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Talend Open Studio is ranked 5th in Data Integration with 47 reviews. Boomi iPaaS is rated 7.8, while Talend Open Studio is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Boomi iPaaS writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Talend Open Studio writes "An open-source ETL tool, when deployed on-premises, requiring an easy installation phase". Boomi iPaaS is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, SSIS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and Tungsten RPA, whereas Talend Open Studio is most compared with SSIS, IBM InfoSphere DataStage, Talend Data Fabric, Talend Data Management Platform and AWS Glue. See our Boomi iPaaS vs. Talend Open Studio report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.