We performed a comparison between Mule Anypoint Platform and Oracle Integration Cloud Service (OIC) based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Mule Anypoint slightly nudges ahead of Oracle Integration Platform in this comparison, as Mule Anypoint offers very good API management. Users can easily define multi-tiered APIs and reuse them as desired. OIC’s payload and file polling limitations are some of the features that prevent the solution from being more competitive in the marketplace.
"API management."
"It is very easy to use for building connectors. It comes with a lot of connectors. For example, it has different adapters for NetSuite, which are very easy to use. It also has Salesforce connectors. The object store feature is also really easy to use. Mule Anypoint Platform is also good in terms of performance and how it is managed behind the scenes."
"This is the easiest and best tool available."
"It can scale."
"MuleSoft offers with the Anypoint Platform a unified platform for API management and an integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) as well as an on-premise Enterprise Service Bus pattern."
"The initial setup is quite easy because the solution has a good interface through which the configuration, mapping, and so on can be done."
"Mule works very well with Salesforce and CRMs."
"This is a good platform for designing, flowing out APIs, and then doing API-based integrations."
"People are able to scale up, learn it quickly, and start delivering."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Integration Cloud Service is its ease of use. We do not depend on any tool to develop it. Everything is on the browser and is easy to integrate, even for someone who does not understand a lot about coding."
"The most important part would be the use of connectors. The significant number of cloud connectors available for active integration is its value."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service offers a lot of adaptors."
"It's very easy to get started on the solution. It's also easy to maintain, scale, and integrate according to cost factors."
"In general, there were a lot of great utilities for working with files."
"The lack of features in something like Oracle Integration Cloud leaves some room for leads implementation partners like us"
"Provides various ways to secure services as well as providing extensive support."
"This becomes an expensive solution over time."
"The solution's pricing model is very strange, and it will be really expensive if you use APIs a lot."
"An on-premise setup requires special skills and you need a lot of professional services."
"The price could be improved."
"Its documentation needed a little bit of work to make it more usable. It is a platform that is used mainly by developers and other people for connecting systems. Its documentation was confusing in some areas and was not very helpful in other areas. I had to go to a consultant to get some work done, which ideally shouldn't be required."
"Adding connectors for new upcoming applications would add extra value to this product."
"In order to set up a storefront, we currently rely on a third-party solution. It would greatly enhance our operations if this feature was integrated into their existing solution."
"Although the solution's proxy design and process are good, it faces connecting issues because it lacks data integration."
"There is a payload size limit and we're unable to integrate some legacy applications."
"Our client was quite concerned about the cost, which is something that could be reduced."
"Configurable timeouts on each connection would be good."
"The solution's customer service could be better."
"They need to make tools framework available for implementation partners"
"It has lengthy documentation, making the process of building applications more time-consuming."
"The bulk processing needs improvement."
"If an inbound file is larger than one GB, it cannot be transformed within Oracle."
More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 1st in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 40 reviews while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 3rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 32 reviews. Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2, while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain". Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, SAP Process Orchestration, SAP Cloud Platform and Azure Data Factory, whereas Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), AWS Glue, Oracle GoldenGate, Azure Data Factory and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps. See our Mule Anypoint Platform vs. Oracle Integration Cloud Service report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.