BrowserStack vs LambdaTest comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
BrowserStack Logo
8,670 views|6,779 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
LambdaTest Logo
4,646 views|2,917 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Jan 2, 2023

We performed a comparison between BrowserStack and LambdaTest based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

  • Ease of Deployment: Users of both solutions say they are easy and straightforward to deploy.
  • Features: BrowserStack users say the solution makes it easy to maintain all of their devices. The solution continuously updates to add the latest devices that are coming onto the market. BrowserStack offers manual testing and good stability and flexibility. Users would like to see better integration with more testing frameworks and feel that at times, process speed could improve.

    LambdaTest users say the solution is reliable, integrates well with other platforms, and improves deployment and team collaboration. The UI is very crisp and easy to learn. Users would like to see better analytics and reporting and feel the scalability is not uniform across different ecosystems.
  • Pricing: BrowserStack users consider the pricing to be expensive. LambdaTest users feel the pricing structure is good.

  • Service and Support: Users of both solutions say the support is good, but there is some room for improvement.

Comparison Results: BrowserStack slightly nudges ahead of LambdaTest in this comparison. BrowserStack offers seamless access - users can use many different devices to gain access. Integration is good and the solution updates regularly to add new device options. LambdaTest is lacking in some basic features that other solutions provide and its performance can be a bit slow.

To learn more, read our detailed BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest Report (Updated: March 2024).
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I have found that BrowserStack is stable.""BrowserStack's best feature is browser testing across different platforms, including mobile.""We like the model device factory for iOS and Android devices.""The most valuable feature is the variety the solution offers around the different types of devices, especially mobile devices.""BrowserStack has lots of devices to choose from.""It is a stable solution. There's no lagging and jittering.""The most valuable features are the variety of tools available.""I like that it offers full device capability."

More BrowserStack Pros →

"LambdaTest offers geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!""The most valuable features are that it's essentially on-demand, and you only focus on getting the code that needs to be executed without having to worry about the OS, hardware, etc.""LambdaTest easily integrates with leading project management, bug tracking, and CI-CD tools like Jira, Asana, Jenkins, Circle CI, and more.""The most valuable feature is the real-time testing, which helps you to test your website on more than two thousand combinations of browsers and operating systems.""In case something goes wrong at LambdaTest end, the Support team is extremely responsive to analyze any platform-related issues.""The slow nature of a cloud platform was compensated with parallel testing, and now we are able to finish our testing job faster than it was before COVID.""Our test execution time was reduced to 16 mins from five hours when executed in parallel on multiple VMs. This has been extremely helpful!""Geolocation testing is as straightforward as ticking checkboxes of browsers, operating systems, and countries."

More LambdaTest Pros →

Cons
"Connectivity can sometimes mar the testing experience.""BrowserStack should work on its Internet connectivity although issues only occur occasionally.""There is some stability issue in the product, making it in areas where improvements are required.""BrowserStack operates at a slow pace, it could improve by making it faster.""I would like to see clearer visibility.""The solution is slow.""Adding better integration with frameworks, particularly testing frameworks like Robot, would be of more value to customers and make their jobs easier.""It is difficult to use for someone who has little to no experience."

More BrowserStack Cons →

"I think Lambdatest is a valuable tool for our team and things that have room for improvement would be mobile app testing, as it can be an important addition to the tool.""Mobile application testing will be an added benefit for us if LambdaTest implements this really soon.""Improvements on a platform need to happen on a timely basis...There should be some new features coming up or some performance improvisation over a period of time.""Mobile application testing would be helpful for us.""Their smart testing module needs improvement.""LambdaTest needs to have native application testing, which would be a great help to my team.""The scalability is good with Amazon, but IBM had some issues.""It would be much easier for us to read the test if they provided dashboard analytics."

More LambdaTest Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This solution costs less than competing products."
  • "The price is fine."
  • "There are different licenses available that can be customized. You can select the features that you want only to use which can be a cost-benefit."
  • "BrowserStack could have a better price, but good things have a price."
  • "The price of BrowserStack is high."
  • "Compared to other solutions, BrowserStack is one of the cheapest."
  • "My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses."
  • "As for pricing, I can't provide a clear evaluation as I'm not directly involved in those discussions."
  • More BrowserStack Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "LambdaTest is on the cloud, offers both free and paid plans which start at $19 USD per month."
  • "This is an affordable product."
  • "The pricing for LambdaTest is affordable, and one of the reasons we implemented it."
  • "It is affordable as compared to similar SaaS solutions."
  • "LambdaTest is priced well, which is why we migrated to it."
  • "It is free to start, which means you can actually see how it works and then take the decision to buy."
  • "It is 60% cheaper and there is no fuss in maintaining the lab, so we have more time to do the testing."
  • "LambdaTest is paid per execution."
  • More LambdaTest Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product's initial setup phase was not very difficult.
    Top Answer:My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses.
    Top Answer:I haven't seen AI in BrowserStack, making it in an area where improvements are required in the product. Accessibility testing is an area of concern where improvements are required.
    Top Answer:The real devices feature is the most valuable feature for us.
    Top Answer:Load flow compared to other stacks needs improvement.
    Ranking
    4th
    Views
    8,670
    Comparisons
    6,779
    Reviews
    14
    Average Words per Review
    372
    Rating
    8.0
    14th
    Views
    4,646
    Comparisons
    2,917
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    364
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Sauce Labs logo
    Compared 24% of the time.
    Perfecto logo
    Compared 23% of the time.
    Tricentis Tosca logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Bitbar logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    CrossBrowserTesting logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Sauce Labs logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    Katalon Studio logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Perfecto logo
    Compared 3% of the time.
    Tricentis Tosca logo
    Compared 3% of the time.
    Bitbar logo
    Compared 2% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview
    BrowserStack is a cloud-based cross-browser testing tool that enables developers to test their websites across various browserson different operating systems and mobile devices, without requiring users to install virtual machines, devices or emulators.

    LambdaTest is a cloud-based cross browser testing platform that helps enterprises run web automation tests at scale (through parallel testing).

    **Selenium Automation Grid and Cypress CLI on LambdaTest**
    You can attain better browser coverage by running tests across 2,000+ different browsers, devices, and operating systems online. LambdaTest provides a secure, scalable, and reliable cloud-based Selenium Grid that helps run Selenium tests at a faster pace.
    The Cypress CLI on LambdaTest, helps you expand Cypress test coverage to 40+ browser versions across Windows and macOS platforms.
    Along with automation testing, you can also perform manual tests, visual UI tests, and real-time tests.

    **LT Browser - Responsive Web Testing**
    Additionally, LambdaTest also offers LT browser - a path-breaking developer-oriented tool that helps assess the responsiveness of your website. LT Browser eases the task of mobile testing as responsive tests can run against 50+ different device resolutions.
    You can also create custom device (or viewports) and test localhost URL without any extensions (or tunnels).

    **Key Features of LambdaTest Platform**
    1. Selenium Web Testing Automation.
    2. Selenium Grid For Mobile Web-Automation Testing.
    3. Run Cypress Tests Across 40+ Browser Versions Of Chrome, Firefox, and Edge.
    4. Parallel Testing For Faster Go To Market Launch.
    5. Continuous Testing with Continuous Integration Tools (e.g. Jenkins, Circle CI, GitLab CI, etc.).
    6. Live Interactive Browser Compatibility Testing.
    7. Scroll Sync To Test Two Viewports Simultaneously Using LT Browser App.
    8. Faster Automated Screenshot Testing.
    9. API For Continuous Testing.

    Sample Customers
    Microsoft, RBS, jQuery, Expedia, Citrix, AIG
    Bringmax, Totpal, Nethhouse, Integreplanner, Cognizant, Vendisol, Clearscale, Edureka
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company55%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Marketing Services Firm9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Retailer7%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company50%
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Aerospace/Defense Firm10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization39%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Retailer5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise26%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise67%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise33%
    Large Enterprise33%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise47%
    Large Enterprise37%
    Buyer's Guide
    BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    BrowserStack is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 25 reviews while LambdaTest is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 18 reviews. BrowserStack is rated 8.0, while LambdaTest is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of BrowserStack writes "Good in the area of automation and offers a high test coverage to users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LambdaTest writes "Cost-effective, good integration, and parallel testing leads to good performance". BrowserStack is most compared with Sauce Labs, Perfecto, Tricentis Tosca, Bitbar and CrossBrowserTesting, whereas LambdaTest is most compared with Sauce Labs, Katalon Studio, Perfecto, Tricentis Tosca and Bitbar. See our BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest report.

    See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.