We compared Check Point Antivirus and Microsoft Exchange Online Protection based on users' reviews in six categories. We reviewed all of the data, and you can find the conclusion below.
Features: Check Point Antivirus impressed users with its diverse set of valuable features like sandboxing, real-time detection, and integration with analytics solutions and the cloud. Microsoft Exchange Online Protection offers seamless integration with Windows, a central alert console, and real-time monitoring of suspicious URLs.
Room for Improvement: Check Point Antivirus requires quicker customer assistance, better performance of the graphical user interface, enhanced defense against zero-day attacks, and more budget-friendly pricing options. Microsoft Exchange Online Protection could offer more training and enhance its security features. Users also requested better encryption, gray email management, and integration with non-Microsoft platforms.
Ease of Deployment: Some users found Check Point’s setup process to be uncomplicated and fast, while others noted that it required several engineers and took around a week to finish. Users had varied experiences setting up Microsoft Exchange Online Protection, ranging from easy to difficult. It may necessitate dedicated personnel for maintenance.
Service and Support: User reviews have provided no information about the customer service of Check Point Antivirus so far. While some users found Microsoft support to be helpful and responsive, others experienced slower response times.
Pricing: The price of Check Point Antivirus may vary depending on partnerships and negotiations. Some users consider Check Point's pricing to be expensive but say it is cost-effective. However, it may not be affordable for small or medium-sized companies unless they have sufficient capital. Some users said Microsoft Exchange Online Protection is expensive, but others considered it reasonable.
ROI: Check Point Antivirus provides added features like a sandbox and VPN licenses, enhancing its value. Users have experienced improved protection and promising growth with Check Point Antivirus, delivering a better ROI than other security options. Microsoft Exchange Online Protection has proven to be a profitable investment.
Comparison Results: Check Point Antivirus offers advanced features like sandboxing, real-time detection, and scalability. At the same time, some users say Check Point could be more affordable and improve its GUI performance. Microsoft Exchange Online Protection is praised for its seamless integration with Windows and useful features like URL holding and threat management, but users say it could improve in areas such as pricing, documentation, and security features.
"We like the sandbox feature."
"There is almost no impact on the security Gateway/Cluster performance after the activation of the blade, especially if you don't scan nested archives."
"New viruses emerge day after day, and this EDR system helps action be taken before viruses affect the internal system."
"It is one of the best security solutions in the market today."
"It offers a really simple and minimally invasive installation for users."
"What I like best about Check Point Antivirus is that it's a strong tool for preventing malicious traffic and threats from entering the environment."
"It is a great, cost-effective, and stable security solution to opt for."
"It has a customer-savvy interface and easily customizable as per client and business requirements."
"We use the solution to receive emails. We do not use the calendar function as our clients are slow adaptors to the latest features."
"The product protects against malware."
"It is scalable."
"The pre-set policies and configuration analyzer are the most valuable features."
"In general, my company is happy with Microsoft support...My company hasn't faced any stability issues with the solution."
"The scalability is pretty good; it does what it is supposed to do."
"Microsoft EOP's most valuable feature is a shared mailbox."
"Microsoft Exchange Online Protection has features like DLP (data loss protection), Safe Attachment, and Safe Links."
"Check Point should provide some technical sessions on antivirus solutions."
"The technical support could be improved."
"The automatic updates use my internet during downloads before I authorize them."
"More posting of user feedback is requested across all websites and Google so that more traction can be attained. Seeing reviews helps create more confidence with clients and partners."
"Overall I didn't personally face any issues while implementing Check Point Antivirus."
"Filtering the websites that can be visited is important also as there's always a chance to come by sites that, just by clicking, will download malicious threats."
"The cases of false positives should substantially be reduced to the greatest extent to keep the efficiency excellent."
"It may be interesting to improve this solution against zero-day attacks, as they happen very frequently and are clearly a severe threat."
"The solution must improve the user experience."
"Microsoft 365 Defender and EOP policies are stable with the proper license. However, with the basic policy, it's hard to say it's stable due to configuration limitations."
"It doesn't protect against everything. We do need protection for, for example, endpoints."
"The solution lacks to elaborate on its spam policies."
"They should specify the difference between Defender for Office 365 and Exchange Online Protection."
"It would be helpful for customers if Plan 1 features were included with EOP."
"The reporting needs a little bit of improvement."
"The management interface of Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) could be intuitive."
More Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Antivirus is ranked 6th in Anti-Malware Tools with 49 reviews while Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) is ranked 11th in Anti-Malware Tools with 34 reviews. Check Point Antivirus is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Check Point Antivirus writes "Compatible, cost-effective, and highly customizable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) writes "An effective email security solution that provides DLP, Safe Attachment, and Safe Links". Check Point Antivirus is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform and VirusTotal, whereas Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Proofpoint Email Protection, Cisco Secure Email, Mimecast Email Security and Fortinet FortiMail. See our Check Point Antivirus vs. Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) report.
See our list of best Anti-Malware Tools vendors.
We monitor all Anti-Malware Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.