Check Point CloudGuard Code Security vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard Code Security and Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The data center security system has provided real-time analytics on performance and data configuration processes.""We have a strong sense of security assurance when utilizing CloudGuard, as it consistently delivers outstanding protection capabilities.""Check Point CloudGuard Code Security helps to improve the code security of our company, generating rapid and complete assessments to be able to make decisions for improvements.""The implementation of this tool for security management and control is very simple.""We have had a number of real events where developers accidentally made commits of API keys, and we were able to detect and begin response actions in minutes. We had the API key revoked in less than five minutes in such events.""Its fastest and most outstanding characteristic is ensuring a development line that will not lead to applying applications or code development.""You can maintain a legal framework structure at all times.""Knowing what measures we must take allows us to reduce costs associated with security in the cloud by providing early identification of a risk or a possible security breach."

More Check Point CloudGuard Code Security Pros →

"It is a stable solution with good support.""Our clients primarily deploy Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP to control the flow of information in and out of their networks. The main use cases include monitoring and managing sensitive data such as credit card information and personally identifiable information.""Another important feature is that the solution doesn't require any additional infrastructure to implement. It's a software license that is compatible with our existing hardware. We were able to install and configure the product seamlessly and effortlessly.""The setup is very easy as we just need to switch on and switch off."

More Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Pros →

Cons
"This is a highly technical solution for users who do not have security experience. It requires specialized knowledge of configurations to use it correctly.""The costs are not transparent.""There needs to be better security around API integration.""I would like this solution to be extended to cellular devices or tablets.""I am satisfied with the performance and results enhanced by this product since we deployed it.""We need to have many of the baselines or development guides providing less complex writing or development.""The enhancements are needed in the logging system and log management processes.""The ease of use could be better."

More Check Point CloudGuard Code Security Cons →

"Its scalability is not on par with the features of others.""There is room for improvement in the documentation around the maintenance of the product, how the automatic updates work, and pushing out new policies. A little more detail and context in that area would be helpful.""You need to have an external solution to backup everything. For example, you need to have Syslog installed on your server as well so that you can back it up to another place.""The solution needs improvement in stability. There has been feedback regarding the accuracy of file categorization."

More Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is extremely affordable and high value for cost."
  • More Check Point CloudGuard Code Security Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It's expensive."
  • "The licensing model is very fair-minded and it's a good value. It scales well... Its licensing model is more streamlined when compared to other DLP solutions."
  • "The pricing of the solution depends on the buyers. But, from my point of view, it is in line with the rest of the products and the price list of Palo Alto."
  • "Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is expensive, and licensing costs are monthly."
  • More Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.
    770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We have had a number of real events where developers accidentally made commits of API keys, and we were able to detect and begin response actions in minutes. We had the API key revoked in less than… more »
    Top Answer:It is extremely affordable and high value for cost.
    Top Answer:There are a lot of opportunities for how they can use their technology to do more. That would be more like sensitive data discovery and other things besides Git Repos, but then you are expanding the… more »
    Top Answer:Our clients primarily deploy Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP to control the flow of information in and out of their networks. The main use cases include monitoring and managing sensitive data such… more »
    Top Answer:Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is expensive, and licensing costs are monthly.
    Top Answer:The solution needs improvement in stability. There has been feedback regarding the accuracy of file categorization.
    Ranking
    Views
    392
    Comparisons
    93
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    587
    Rating
    8.3
    Views
    1,905
    Comparisons
    551
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    840
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Spectral
    Learn More
    Overview

    CloudGuard Code Security’s automated tools integrate with developers’ tools to detect code vulnerabilities and to identify secrets and misconfigurations in the code before deployment, preventing unauthorized use to nefarious ends. With CloudGuard Code Security, organizations can prevent exposing API keys, tokens and credentials, in addition to remediating security misconfigurations. With a super-fast platform, CloudGuard Code Security ensures security without compromising productivity.

    Cloud-Delivered Data Protection: The industry’s first cloud-delivered Enterprise DLP that consistently protects sensitive data across all networks, clouds and users.

    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Security Firm36%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Transportation Company9%
    Engineering Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Security Firm11%
    Government10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Insurance Company10%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business60%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise25%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise66%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Check Point CloudGuard Code Security vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point CloudGuard Code Security vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Check Point CloudGuard Code Security is ranked 11th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 11 reviews while Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is ranked 14th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 4 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard Code Security is rated 8.4, while Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard Code Security writes "Good security and functionality with helpful support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention writes "A solution having automation as one of its strongest points". Check Point CloudGuard Code Security is most compared with Snyk and Aqua Cloud Security Platform, whereas Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Zscaler DLP and Cyberhaven. See our Check Point CloudGuard Code Security vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention report.

    See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

    We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.