We performed a comparison between Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is the OCR."
"The solution is easy to manage."
"This solution has a great encryption feature."
"We receive a lot of insights from this product."
"The incident management and fingerprinting have been the most valuable features."
"The ease of configuration was probably one of its biggest selling points."
"The Optical Character Recognition (OCR) functionality is another helpful feature, especially for unstructured data. Being able to discover sensitive data in an unstructured format is the most beneficial element of the solution."
"The most valuable feature is security."
"Our clients primarily deploy Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP to control the flow of information in and out of their networks. The main use cases include monitoring and managing sensitive data such as credit card information and personally identifiable information."
"The setup is very easy as we just need to switch on and switch off."
"Another important feature is that the solution doesn't require any additional infrastructure to implement. It's a software license that is compatible with our existing hardware. We were able to install and configure the product seamlessly and effortlessly."
"It is a stable solution with good support."
More Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Pros →
"It would be wonderful if the solution could develop more AI and machine learning capabilities. It would also be good if the solution was able to integrate with other ML and AI solutions. Right now, this is lacking."
"One area that could be improved is the support. The current support is not very good. Because they don't come on time when a customer really needs it, they take a lot of time to troubleshoot anything."
"The APIs for device integration are limited, so that could be improved."
"When you automatically try to upgrade the agent it causes problems."
"They can improve a bit in the OCR category. The OCR deployment could be simplified. Right now, you have to set up a separate server to manage all the data going through the network, especially the images. Forcepoint could better integrate the OCR component with central management."
"There is no support for the Bangla (Bengali) language, so we cannot use the Forcepoint technology for Bangla documents."
"The solution lacks sufficient customization."
"This solution has a tendency to provide false-positive results."
"Its scalability is not on par with the features of others."
"There is room for improvement in the documentation around the maintenance of the product, how the automatic updates work, and pushing out new policies. A little more detail and context in that area would be helpful."
"The solution needs improvement in stability. There has been feedback regarding the accuracy of file categorization."
"You need to have an external solution to backup everything. For example, you need to have Syslog installed on your server as well so that you can back it up to another place."
More Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Cons →
More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is ranked 2nd in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 51 reviews while Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is ranked 14th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 4 reviews. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.0, while Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention writes "DLP great for encryptions; tech support is quite helpful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention writes "A solution having automation as one of its strongest points". Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector and Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention, whereas Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Zscaler DLP, Cyberhaven, Symantec Data Loss Prevention and Check Point CloudGuard Code Security. See our Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.