We performed a comparison between Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade and Microsoft BitLocker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Encryption solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has addressed storage and data transfer demands efficiently."
"It keeps the devices well monitored."
"They have Disc Encryption, Anti-Malware, and a VPN Blade which is beneficial for us."
"End-to-end encryption provides full disk encryption, ensuring that all data on the device, including the operating system."
"The encryption ensures each of our drives is not invasive and that the user does not have a bad experience even while the drive is being encrypted."
"Its ability to provide a security layer of encryption that allows us to prevent unauthorized access to computers."
"The solution provides complete security for one's workstation."
"We never had any complaints about the performance of computers with this tool to be able to manage the protection of disks and drives."
"It's very straightforward to recover data. It's safe for us; in case of lost information, it provides multiple options to recover the data."
"As a Microsoft shop, we find this product easy to use."
"It is an encryption tool and provides security."
"I liked the way it works with our Microsoft tools. As we roll out Intune, we can validate if the device has been encrypted, and if not, we can push it down. It is pretty simple to deploy."
"The platform provides good performance."
"The solution has a feature that automatically asks the users to upgrade their password once we set up the process."
"Integration with System Center Configuration Manager (C: and D: logical drives are encrypted before installing Windows via SCCM)."
"Being able to encrypt an entire hard disk has been most valuable."
"The response time for technical support could be faster."
"I would like to bring centralized management to mobile devices."
"In the future, I would like to see is the ability to decrypt equipment."
"I rate the support from Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade a six out of ten."
"The cost of maintaining the system is high for personal use."
"The tool is too expensive to be an add-on to the main solution. They could launch it independently so that costs can be lowered."
"Sometimes the performance rates are not consistent."
"Regarding the general topic of support, many have annoyances with it."
"The visualization could be better."
"They can improve the security of the application and include an encryption disk in the next feature."
"I often have to make multiple attempts to log in."
"It is not good for cross-compatibility, so our Mac users are not able to use it."
"The solution lacks the ability to allow its user to provide limited access to someone."
"At the end of it all, we are looking for something that can be easier to manage."
"The console GUI could be better."
"For improvement, as it is now, I do not have any support from anyone. There should be a web interface to manage BitLocker. But for now, all I do is just install a new product on the user's machine and create it. I would like to be able to see everything that is happening, even if it is just through a web interface. I would also like to be able to see how many users are provisioned, which users are using BitLocker, and how to disable or enable it. That's what I would like to see."
More Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is ranked 3rd in Endpoint Encryption with 16 reviews while Microsoft BitLocker is ranked 1st in Endpoint Encryption with 61 reviews. Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is rated 8.6, while Microsoft BitLocker is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade writes "Centralized management with full disk encryption and helpful authentification capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft BitLocker writes "User-friendly, easy to set up, and offers real-time machine status updates". Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is most compared with Cisco Secure Endpoint and McAfee Complete Data Protection, whereas Microsoft BitLocker is most compared with ESET Endpoint Encryption, McAfee Complete Data Protection, Symantec Endpoint Encryption, Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption and CyberArk Identity. See our Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs. Microsoft BitLocker report.
See our list of best Endpoint Encryption vendors and best Mobile Data Protection vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Encryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
