We performed a comparison between CyberArk Identity and Microsoft BitLocker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO)."The most valuable feature of CyberArk Identity is the adaptive interface."
"CyberArk Identity is a mature product."
"The setup, via cloud, is simple."
"The most valuable features of CyberArk Identity are its ability to control access to administrative staff."
"The user self-service program and the Office 365 provisioning service feature are the most valuable. It is a very easy and feature-rich solution that gives priority to the users and security."
"The initial setup is straightforward. It takes me up to an hour and a half."
"I like the RBAC (Role-Based Access Control). It basically involves defining various roles, and then simply assigning those roles to users."
"The feature that we find most valuable is the ability to integrate multiple IDs for on-premises Active Directory."
"The hard drive encryption is very good."
"It maintains security on my computer. Since I travel a lot, it gives me confidence that if, for some reason, my computer is lost, my data won't be compromised."
"Whole Disk Encryption is great. BitLocker runs seamlessly during boot up."
"We have not seen any bugs or glitches, so the stability is good."
"I like BitLocker because it gives us strong encryption to protect our data."
"It's very straightforward to recover data. It's safe for us; in case of lost information, it provides multiple options to recover the data."
"The most valuable feature is the simplicity and integration with the Microsoft Clouds platform."
"The tool is stable."
"The solution could be easier to use and I found it to be very complex involving many steps."
"The tool has issues with the third-party SMS gateway. The solution has its own SMS gateway. Integration support is a challenge when we don’t use their SMS gateway. The tool also needs to improve its scalability."
"The user interface could be improved."
"CyberArk Identity could improve by having the ability to better manage the network, such as Cisco. There seem to be some issues in this area."
"CyberArk Identity's GUI is an area with certain shortcomings that need improvement."
"More integrations would be better."
"They could improve their UI and make everything more user-friendly."
"In terms of general user feedback, the more security you put in front of a user, the more they complain. So usability and the user experience are always a challenge. So there's always room for improvement."
"More customization options would have been nice, such as password selection, actions when the screen is locked, etc."
"Some of the technical internal functions, such as encryption protocols or something similar, could be improved."
"I would like to see improvement in the solution's central management of passwords. Currently, we install it separately."
"In future releases, I would like to see a feature where I can have a view of each device that has BitLocker to see if these machines are encrypted or not. So, I just want a view or a dashboard that can tell us so that I can remediate and add BitLocker to those systems or devices."
"The people at the first level of support refer you to articles that do not pertain to the problem at hand."
"I would recommend BitLocker only because of the economic side, not the technical side. If the features were included in the already existing licenses I would use it. If not, I would recommend other products."
"They should offer better login capabilities that are more secure."
"There are options which could be implemented to make it a little more like PGP Whole Disk Encryption."
CyberArk Identity is ranked 9th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 17 reviews while Microsoft BitLocker is ranked 1st in Endpoint Encryption with 61 reviews. CyberArk Identity is rated 8.2, while Microsoft BitLocker is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CyberArk Identity writes "Allows Linux and Unix administrators to login with single password ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft BitLocker writes "User-friendly, easy to set up, and offers real-time machine status updates". CyberArk Identity is most compared with Microsoft Intune, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Microsoft Entra ID, SailPoint IdentityIQ and Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, whereas Microsoft BitLocker is most compared with ESET Endpoint Encryption, McAfee Complete Data Protection, Symantec Endpoint Encryption, Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption and Boxcryptor.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.