We performed a comparison between Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade and Symantec Endpoint Encryption based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Encryption solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a cross-platform tool."
"The most valuable feature of Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is hard disk protection."
"The encryption ensures each of our drives is not invasive and that the user does not have a bad experience even while the drive is being encrypted."
"Its ability to provide a security layer of encryption that allows us to prevent unauthorized access to computers."
"It's easily scalable and adaptable to the needs of the business."
"It helps us maximize the operational efficiency and performance of our activities."
"This encryption is relatively fast and really covers the needs required."
"We never had any complaints about the performance of computers with this tool to be able to manage the protection of disks and drives."
"This product is a solid, all-in-one solution for enterprise data management."
"We can extend it to all of the critical endpoints and the servers, and we can ensure the confidentiality of the data."
"It is fairly stable."
"We have been very satisfied with the solution's security capabilities."
"I like the solution for its encryption."
"I like the management aspect of this solution. You don't want to have end-users tweak or set it themselves, so the fact that you could do it from a central point helped us a lot."
"The best feature of Symantec Endpoint Encryption is the encryption itself. Encryption truly is the way to go because nowadays we are living in an era of widespread server threats, and you need to encrypt your emails and documents because you never know who might get hold of them."
"It has reduced the number of incidents related to the loss of information."
"Regarding the general topic of support, many have annoyances with it."
"In the future, I would like to see is the ability to decrypt equipment."
"The price is high for small scale business enterprises."
"They should improve the interface and make it a little more user-friendly."
"They could improve the latency in the platform when entering the portal."
"I would like to bring centralized management to mobile devices."
"The encryption is fast; however, when it comes to generating decryption of the OS disks, it is sometimes very slow, generating a loss of time."
"The tool is too expensive to be an add-on to the main solution. They could launch it independently so that costs can be lowered."
"The solution does not have endpoint control."
"There are some issues with the single sign-on with the active directory. We had a few problems related to the synchronization between the active directory and the login features of the Symantec products because the users made many password changes during the day. The time for synchronization with the solutions can be improved. I would like to see mobile encryption. There should be a possibility to include all the mobiles of a company in the console. Many customers are asking about encryptions for tablets or cell phones, but we don't have any product that we are comfortable with to recommend to our customers."
"The program's disk encryption is not very friendly with Microsoft OS updates. We have a problem with updates failing unless we use a time-consuming work-around."
"The UI could be improved."
"It was hard to install and took us about three months."
"What I didn't find helpful in the version we used is the fact that all devices had to be on the same network for us to push through the encryption."
"I do not find the environment to be very user-friendly."
"I can only patch monthly. I don't know what the solution is there, besides being vulnerable for three weeks out of four. But there's got to be an option somehow."
More Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is ranked 4th in Endpoint Encryption with 16 reviews while Symantec Endpoint Encryption is ranked 7th in Endpoint Encryption with 34 reviews. Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is rated 8.6, while Symantec Endpoint Encryption is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade writes "Centralized management with full disk encryption and helpful authentification capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Endpoint Encryption writes "Provides a centralized management console and a straightforward initial setup process ". Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is most compared with Microsoft BitLocker, Cisco Secure Endpoint and McAfee Complete Data Protection, whereas Symantec Endpoint Encryption is most compared with Microsoft BitLocker, McAfee Complete Data Protection, Cisco Secure Endpoint, Digital Guardian and WinMagic SecureDoc. See our Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption report.
See our list of best Endpoint Encryption vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Encryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
