We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and Digital.ai Application Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools."The process of remediating software security vulnerabilities can now be performed (ongoing) as portions of the application are being built in advance of being compiled."
"Overall, the ability to find vulnerabilities in the code is better than the tool that we were using before."
"The main thing we find valuable about Checkmarx is the ease of use. It's easy to initiate scans and triage defects."
"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are the Best Fix Location and the Payments option because you can save a lot of time trying to mitigate the configuration. Using these tools can save you a lot of time."
"It's not an obstacle for developers. They can easily write their code and make it more secure with Checkmarx."
"One of the most valuable features is it is flexible."
"The only thing I like is that Checkmarx does not need to compile."
"Our static operation security has been able to identify more security issues since implementing this solution."
"I used the tool to prepare for the interview as a Business Developer. It helped me improve my understanding on software security."
"The plugins for the development environment have room for improvements such as for Android Studio and X code."
"Checkmarx could improve the solution reports and false positives. The false positives could be reduced. For example, we have alerts that are tagged as vulnerabilities but when you drill down they are not."
"Its pricing model can be improved. Sometimes, it is a little complex to understand its pricing model."
"I really would like to integrate it as a service along with the SAP HANA Cloud Platform. It will then be easy to use it directly as a service."
"One area for improvement in Checkmarx is pricing, as it's more expensive than other products."
"The reports are good, but they still need to be improved considering what the UI offers."
"They can support the remaining languages that are currently not supported. They can also create a different model that can identify zero-day attacks. They can work on different patterns to identify and detect zero-day vulnerability attacks."
"Its user interface could be improved and made more friendly."
"I would like the tool to integrate AI and automation that is dedicated to detecting software vulnerabilities."
Checkmarx One is ranked 3rd in Application Security Tools with 67 reviews while Digital.ai Application Security is ranked 36th in Application Security Tools with 1 review. Checkmarx One is rated 7.6, while Digital.ai Application Security is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Digital.ai Application Security writes "Helps to improve knowledge on software security ". Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and Coverity, whereas Digital.ai Application Security is most compared with SonarQube, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and Fortify Application Defender.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
