We performed a comparison between Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) and SAP Mobile Secure based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, JAMF, VMware and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)."We already use a lot of Microsoft products in our company, and therefore, it made sense to also use this product."
"We are a remote company, and the product helps us manage the global endpoints. It helps us natively manage the endpoints in the cloud from anywhere."
"The tool's most valuable feature is Autopilot."
"It is very easy to use. It has a very easy interface."
"Microsoft's cloud comes with a lot of extra features that are free of charge."
"The ability to send configurations to our systems is valuable, particularly as we don't have a regular Windows AD server. Our current environment doesn't have a Windows AD, which limits our ability to push GPOs. However, this is where the solution can step in and help us push policies."
"At the moment, Autopilot is the most valuable feature."
"The one feature we find most useful is the Mobile Application Manager. There are two types, we have the complete MDM and the Mobile Application Manager(MAM). We don't give our users phones, it is their own personal phone, and we need to allow them to have access to the company detail on their phone. We need to create a balance between their own personal data and the company data. We deploy the Mobile Application Manager for them so that we won't be able to interfere with their own personal data."
"The stability of the solution is very good. It's reliable. We don't have crashes or experience freezing. There aren't bugs or glitches."
"The most significant benefit is that the deployment is quick and painless. You don't need a specialized IT department to implement and scale the network. It's easy to maintain, too. It only requires one or two network administrators."
"We use this solution for MDM."
"Security is the main feature because the company is reliable."
"It's extremely competitive and very good for a product in this sphere."
"The proprietary standards and modules are the most valuable features."
"The central management console on the cloud is fast and is the solution's most valuable feature."
"The cloud manager is user-friendly, and I can manage everything from one dashboard."
"Everything is available to you from your handset."
"For an existing customer who has an SCCM, it would need to be upgraded to an MECM first before I can introduce Microsoft Intune."
"Lacks the ability to deploy more ways of management, managing devices and processing the policies."
"There needs to be more support for Mac operating systems."
"The installation is very easy. However, to be able to configure it you will need special knowledge, such as training or self-studies to have a proper level of security. There are many settings one has to understand before being able to implement Microsoft Intune."
"The pricing can be expensive if you are not combining it with other products."
"The documentation about the custom image setup could be better. Although Microsoft provides the steps to configure Intune or set up or deploy Intune, it doesn't have much information related to custom images. If you ask, "how can we deploy the custom image?" There is no information. The steps they mention ask you to connect to your on-premises environment or create your own image on the cloud itself once there is connectivity. But I needed to go to multiple websites to get all this information. I had to figure out how to upload the custom image if you want to use the on-premise custom image for Cloud PC. If you have the proper subscription, you must have the right access, like global admin or owner. Then you can add your custom image to that. There are no steps mentioned over there. Microsoft Intune doesn't have Chrome browser support. I would like to have that support because they will want it if we pitch the product to clients."
"There is no catalog for mobile access management (MAM) security."
"The configuration and pricing can be improved."
"The solution can be expensive."
"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a four out of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy. It is more difficult."
"Sometimes, the integrations are a bit tough."
"The cost of installing this solution can be more expensive depending on who is doing the installation. Cisco is very expensive, and I'd like to see a reduction in cost."
"The tool's pricing needs to be more flexible like Cisco's."
"I've participated in numerous product launches primarily focused on HP and Dell. Consequently, there should be a vested interest in local gatherings to showcase product advantages and performance. Particularly in Singapore, it only has so limited integrators to engage in IP product sales. There's room for improvement through dedicated workshops and training. The European and Western markets differ significantly from the context here. The physical location holds more importance. Thus, they should have a survey to evaluate demand, supply, and sales points, tailoring strategies accordingly."
"Linux compatibility needs improvement."
"The price could be better."
"We would like it if SAP could integrate the transactional mode as well so that users can perform transactional jobs by mobile-only."
More Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is ranked 6th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 26 reviews while SAP Mobile Secure is ranked 26th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM). Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is rated 8.4, while SAP Mobile Secure is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) writes "Easy to use and excels in generating reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Mobile Secure writes "Easy to use and set up with easy mobile access to reports". Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, IBM MaaS360 and SOTI MobiControl, whereas SAP Mobile Secure is most compared with .
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
