We performed a comparison between Cisco Threat Grid and CrowdStrike Falcon based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, Check Point Software Technologies, Microsoft and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms."The most valuable feature is the integration with firewalls. It's integrated with AMP so the ecosystem with equal solutions from Threat Grid is good with CISCO products."
"It is easy to implement and is very scalable. It also comes with very good documentation. Cisco provides good technical support as well."
"The simplicity of implementation is valuable."
"The threat intelligence is the most valuable feature."
"One of the most valuable features of CrowdStrike Falcon is when there are upgrades there are no additional fees."
"Regarding features, I appreciate its integration capabilities with identity providers...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable feature of CrowdStrike Falcon is its accuracy."
"CrowdStrike Falcon's most valuable features are the lightweight agent which has absolutely zero performance issues. There is no performance deterioration on the laptop on the network. It is a signature-less antivirus and anti-malware solution, it doesn't depend on signatures which better protects the systems."
"I like the vulnerability assessment and proactive hunting features of CrowdStrike Falcon."
"The managed services are distinguished, responsive, dynamic, flexible, and assertive when taking action."
"It seems to do a pretty good job of protecting the host. It offers good insights that it gives you when it has a detection. It's pretty incredible."
"Support must be improved."
"I was told that the user interface could be more user friendly and easy in comparison to that of competitors. I remember that there is a competitor who has a much easier interface for many users to interact with."
"They come in and have multiple management solutions but it doesn't scan or doesn't have the ability to look at every file extension."
"I would like to see the machine learning feature enhanced."
"Support, particularly related to after-sales and after deployment, could be improved a bit. If you need to connect to support, it takes at least a day to reach the support team and get a proper reply."
"It can be expensive depending on the features you select."
"The price is too high."
"CrowdStrike Falcon could improve the logs by making them free to the API."
"I've found that CrowdStrike's technical support could benefit from increased technical expertise."
"We would like to be able to perform on-demand scanning, rather than relying on the scheduler."
"In the future release of CrowdStrike Falcon, they should add a sandbox feature."
Cisco Threat Grid is ranked 21st in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 3 reviews while CrowdStrike Falcon is ranked 3rd in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 106 reviews. Cisco Threat Grid is rated 7.6, while CrowdStrike Falcon is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Cisco Threat Grid writes "Has good integration with firewalls but has limited file extensions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CrowdStrike Falcon writes "Easy to set up with good behavior-based analysis but needs a single-click recovery option". Cisco Threat Grid is most compared with Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence and Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus, whereas CrowdStrike Falcon is most compared with Microsoft Defender XDR, Darktrace, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trend Micro Deep Security and Trend Vision One.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.