Cisco Threat Grid vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Logo
511 views|268 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Palo Alto Networks Logo
1,164 views|388 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Threat Grid and Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, Check Point Software Technologies, Microsoft and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms.
To learn more, read our detailed Threat Intelligence Platforms Report (Updated: April 2024).
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The simplicity of implementation is valuable.""It is easy to implement and is very scalable. It also comes with very good documentation. Cisco provides good technical support as well.""The most valuable feature is the integration with firewalls. It's integrated with AMP so the ecosystem with equal solutions from Threat Grid is good with CISCO products."

More Cisco Threat Grid Pros →

"The feature that I like best is the dashboard.""The most valuable feature is alerting.""I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security.""The logs play a crucial role as they contribute to blocking unwanted Internet traffic.""It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats."

More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Pros →

Cons
"Support must be improved.""They come in and have multiple management solutions but it doesn't scan or doesn't have the ability to look at every file extension.""I was told that the user interface could be more user friendly and easy in comparison to that of competitors. I remember that there is a competitor who has a much easier interface for many users to interact with."

More Cisco Threat Grid Cons →

"I would like the tool to see more integration with Cortex XDR. There is no real reason to keep them separate.""It would be helpful to have better documentation for configuring and installing the solution.""It is a completely cloud-based product at present.""It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it.""I would like to have more technical documentation that contains greater detail on the types of threats that are occurring."

More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "If I remember correctly, the licensing cost is a little bit higher than that of the competitor."
  • More Cisco Threat Grid Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is expensive."
  • "The solution is reasonably priced."
  • More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The simplicity of implementation is valuable.
    Top Answer:The way the management file is integrated into the environment must be improved.
    Top Answer:I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security.
    Top Answer:I would like the tool to see more integration with Cortex XDR. There is no real reason to keep them separate.
    Top Answer:The tool along with other suite of products provides us with threat and alert information.
    Ranking
    Views
    511
    Comparisons
    268
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    205
    Rating
    7.0
    Views
    1,164
    Comparisons
    388
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    354
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Threat Grid, ThreatGrid
    Learn More
    Overview

    Cisco Threat Grid crowd-sources malware from a closed community and analyzes all samples using proprietary, highly secure techniques that include static and dynamic (sandboxing) analysis. It correlates the results with hundreds of millions of other analyzed malware artifacts to provide a global view of malware attacks, campaigns, and their distribution. Security teams can quickly correlate a single samples of observed activity and characteristics against millions of other samples to fully understand its behaviors in a historical and global context. This ability helps analysts effectively defend against both targeted attacks and the broader threats from advanced malware. Threat Grid’s detailed reports, including the identification of important behavioral indicators and the assignment of threat scores, let you quickly prioritize and recover from advanced attacks.

    AutoFocus contextual threat intelligence service accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Unique, targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.

    Sample Customers
    Center for Internet Security (CIS), ADP
    Telkom Indonesia
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Healthcare Company9%
    Retailer7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise69%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Threat Intelligence Platforms
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, Check Point Software Technologies, Microsoft and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Updated: April 2024.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco Threat Grid is ranked 21st in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 3 reviews while Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is ranked 10th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 5 reviews. Cisco Threat Grid is rated 7.6, while Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Cisco Threat Grid writes "Has good integration with firewalls but has limited file extensions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus writes "Impressive performance and monitoring capabilities but lacks in documentation". Cisco Threat Grid is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon and Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence, whereas Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is most compared with ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP), Anomali ThreatStream, VirusTotal and LogRhythm SIEM.

    See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.

    We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.