We performed a comparison between Citrix ShareFile and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Box, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms."The solution is scalable."
"The Enterprise Dropbox solution is highly integrated with Microsoft's Office 365 and Azure products."
"The solution would query the Active Directory, and if new accounts were identified, Citrix ShareFile would add them automatically."
"It's user-friendly for end users."
"Easy to manage and fully secure."
"ShareFile gives you all of the features of cloud providers, but in an on-premises solution."
"Citrix has a very good file auditing features and security features."
"This provides us with a secure way of sending tax returns without having to use passwords."
"It has helped us with storing all the documents, which means that people are not going to intervene. There is a way of extracting knowledge within documentation and tracking it. There are knowledge assets for where documentation is stored, indexed and searchable through SharePoint."
"SharePoint enabled the staff to share documents and work on a document simultaneously."
"The ability to have version control and co-editing is vital to our workflows."
"The most valuable features are the Integrations, web site, and search."
"It offers ease of use, which is crucial."
"The access control is definitely a good feature. We also appreciate the improvements they've made to the online applications, where multiple users can work on the same documents simultaneously. Everything syncs automatically."
"There is not just one valuable feature; it is all of them working together."
"The search feature is valuable."
"DLP features are lacking and required because, especially with everyone working from home, security is now paramount when the data is on BYOD devices."
"The configuration on the mobile devices is a little clunky, in terms of setting up the application."
"They should integrate the solution with more email services."
"My only issue with this solution is the cost, which should be improved."
"There are sometimes scalability issues after updates."
"Everything they have should be integrated into one item."
"The user interface is not very intuitive."
"Some of our customers are facing issues if they've deployed in hybrid mode."
"The workflow engine cannot support the business needs."
"More hints and make it more user-customizable."
"The areas of this solution that need improvement are the relationships between lists, cross-site web parts, and page-building tools."
"It should have more user-friendly customization, as it still requires developers to get engaged and build sites."
"SharePoint sometimes cannot handle the amount of co-editing that we do."
"No good process to import emails from several users into a single comprehensive SP repository."
"I would like it to be more compliant with global regulations. There are certain features which could be included that currently are not there, such as compliance and record management capabilities."
"It is too heavy. MS should not have paid foreign coders dollars per each row of code. They wasted the stability and reliability in the end."
Citrix ShareFile is ranked 9th in Content Collaboration Platforms with 11 reviews while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 146 reviews. Citrix ShareFile is rated 8.4, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Citrix ShareFile writes "Flexible plans, stable, and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Citrix ShareFile is most compared with Dropbox, Microsoft OneDrive, Box, Office 365 and Egnyte, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, Box, WordPress and OpenText Documentum.
We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
