We performed a comparison between Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop and Oracle NoSQL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases."The search function is the most valuable aspect of the solution."
"Customer service and support were able to fix whatever the issue was."
"CDH has a wide variety of proprietary tools that we use, like Impala. So from that perspective, it's quite useful as opposed to something open-source. We get a lot of value from Cloudera's proprietary tools."
"The features I find most valuable is that the solution is that it is easy to install and to work with. It starts with the installation and from there on the management is very simple and centralized."
"The data science aspect of the solution is valuable."
"It is helpful to gather and process data."
"The main advantage is the storage is less expensive."
"The solution is reliable and stable, it fits our requirements."
"The tool performs well."
"NoSQL has high availability. I think it's perfect from a technical perspective. It's quick to run and go."
"The tool is easy to learn."
"The product meets expectations when it comes to stability."
"There is a maximum of a one-gigabyte block size, which is an area of storage that can be improved upon."
"It would be useful if Cloudera had more tools like SQL Engines that offer the traditional relational database. We have to do a lot of work preparing the data outside Cloudera before getting it into the platform."
"There are multiple bugs when we update."
"The dashboard could be improved."
"The solution is not fit for on-premise distributions."
"The Cloudera training has deteriorated significantly."
"Currently, we are using many other tools such as Spark and Blade Job to improve the performance."
"The governance aspect of the solution should be improved."
"Oracle could improve how NoSQL works in containers. I don't think NoSQL needs any new features, but I want to see new features in the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. I would like to see some improvements in OCI's building options."
"The installation is difficult."
"Handling big data in a user-friendly way is currently a bit of an issue. The dashboard for this needs some work."
"The licensing model is bad."
More Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is ranked 5th in NoSQL Databases with 47 reviews while Oracle NoSQL is ranked 8th in NoSQL Databases with 7 reviews. Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is rated 8.0, while Oracle NoSQL is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop writes "Good end-to-end security features and we like that it's cloud independent". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle NoSQL writes "The implementation is simple and only takes 15 to 30 minutes". Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is most compared with Amazon EMR, HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric, Apache Spark and MongoDB, whereas Oracle NoSQL is most compared with MongoDB, Cassandra, ScyllaDB and InfluxDB.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.