CockroachDB vs IBM Db2 Database comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cockroach Logo
4,096 views|2,720 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
10,870 views|7,336 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CockroachDB and IBM Db2 Database based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed CockroachDB vs. IBM Db2 Database Report (Updated: March 2024).
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The availability and the easy to use feature is the most valuable. The documentation is also good.""CockroachDB is highly reliable.""The product has valuable security features.""I use CockroachDB to test big data samples and to create the best structure for databases. We have four users and required 10 people for deployment and maintenance.""The most valuable features of the solution are its resiliency features and the geo-partitioning capabilities.""The tool's most valuable feature is node syncing, which takes only 0.54 milliseconds.""The best feature of CockroachDB is the ability to keep the nodes in different locations.""The initial setup and deployment are simple."

More CockroachDB Pros →

"Reliable, robust with great features.""The most valuable feature is PowerPC support.""I like that its true active-active. For example, if there are two instances within a cluster, we can take one of them down and there's no failover or switch over. There's no primary and secondary, it's true active-active. We can take one side down and we can upgrade that with new maintenance or a new version, obviously testing coexistence beforehand, without impacting the business.""Its functionality and availability are valuable. Its availability is great. It is available 99.99% of the time.""The most valuable feature of the IBM Db2 Database is security.""It has a good feature called pureScale, which is just for scalability. It is a perfect solution for environments where scalability is going to be an issue.""The most valuable aspect of this solution is its stability. We have never had any problems and have never had to contact technical support.""The most valuable features are with the industrial side."

More IBM Db2 Database Pros →

Cons
"The platform could be more extensible.""Cockroach does not support all types of protocols. I need to improve it myself to support a CouchDB on my network.""The closer they can make CockroachDB to being completely compatible with Postgres, the better. It's almost compatible, but not completely. If it was, it would be nice to just be able to use Postgres libraries without any fiddling.""I find the serverless offer a bit confusing.""We are looking for more features to support distributed high availability and geo-partitioning.""CockroachDB needs to improve store processes.""The initial setup and pricing could be improved.""The product must improve its disaster recovery features."

More CockroachDB Cons →

"IBM Db2 Database could improve in the steps it takes for upgrades. It is not an easy process. The process of upgrading the version is lengthy and requires a lot of time. To make it more efficient, I suggest implementing some automation on the solution side. This will greatly reduce the time required for the upgrade.""GUI needs improvement.""The only drawback that we see in Db2 Database is the crash recovery. When there is a crash and somebody has to do the recovery, Db2 Database first stops, and then it does any crash recovery. In Oracle Database, crash recovery happens within the database. The database is not shut down.""The solution's UI hasn't been upgraded. The solution’s UI is an area to improve because the solution was developed long ago.""End-to-end encryption specifically is something the solution needs to have in the next release.""The initial set up was complex.""​Not very solid compared to its competitors' products.​""It would be helpful to have more querying tools and more development tools for us to work easily with Microsoft."

More IBM Db2 Database Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I've used CockroachDB at a small scale on the free accounts because we are only testing."
  • "The pricing is good but can be made cheaper. I would rate the pricing a five out of ten."
  • "The platform is affordable even for the enterprise version. It provides value for investment in terms of performance."
  • "The product's price depends on the user's company and the contract model they enter into with CockroachDB. Depending on the contract model one enters into with CockroachDB, the product may or may not be expensive."
  • More CockroachDB Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "They are competitive and honest (compared to how peer firms approach licensing conversations). ​"
  • "Compared to Oracle, it is so much cheaper."
  • "Licensing fees are on a yearly basis."
  • "We don't see what the specific price of the DB2 license is because we pay for the backup license as a package."
  • "I think that everyone knows that with IBM the standard price is higher than the others."
  • "Db2 is less expensive than Oracle."
  • "We did not buy it. It came with our hardware without any complimentary maintenance. If I compare Db2 Database with Oracle Database, its price is lower than Oracle Database."
  • "There is a license for this solution and we pay every three years."
  • More IBM Db2 Database Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The subset of SQL that my client is using is completely supported.
    Top Answer:I find the serverless offer a bit confusing. The price is a function of the maximum database size. A single SELECT can use a number of request units, for example. If the throughput is high enough, you… more »
    Top Answer:Cockroach nodes were installed in the following: 1. Single host, triple nodes (containers): for evaluation on a low-end PC. 2. Single host, triple nodes (process): to test applications against a… more »
    Top Answer:Db2 database scalability and performance capabilities match our database needs. It covers pretty much everything a database administrator or engineer might need.
    Top Answer:I would rate the pricing a five out of ten. Since it's a government contract, the rates are negotiated and agreed upon with the government. So, it's not like the standard market price. It's not super… more »
    Top Answer:Db2 interface could be improved a bit. Comparing it to Oracle, Db2's interfaces could be improved.
    Ranking
    Views
    4,096
    Comparisons
    2,720
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    416
    Rating
    8.5
    Views
    10,870
    Comparisons
    7,336
    Reviews
    28
    Average Words per Review
    453
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    DB2
    Learn More
    Overview

    CockroachDB is a distributed SQL database built on a transactional and strongly-consistent key-value store. It scales horizontally; survives disk, machine, rack, and even datacenter failures with minimal latency disruption and no manual intervention; supports strongly-consistent ACID transactions; and provides a familiar SQL API for structuring, manipulating, and querying data.

    CockroachDB is inspired by Google’s Spanner and F1 technologies, and it’s completely open source.

    DB2 Enterprise for Linux, UNIX, and Windows is the ideal data server for the most demanding workloads. New XML support is designed to help firms minimize the time and effort it takes to persist and use their XML data reducing development costs and improving business agility.
    Sample Customers
    Baidu, Kindred, Tierion, Heroic Labs, Gorgias
    Knorr-Bremse, Mizuho Bank Ltd., Australian Government Department of Defence, SCHWENK Zement, Friedhelm Loh Group, YAZAKI Europe Limited, Ekornes ASA, Baldor Electric, VSN Systemen BV, Lion Brewery (Ceylon) PLC, PLANSEE Group, TE Connectivity, Hansgrohe SE, Openmatics, University of Toronto
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm39%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Retailer6%
    Manufacturing Company4%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm38%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Insurance Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization52%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Computer Software Company5%
    Government4%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business60%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise73%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business8%
    Midsize Enterprise56%
    Large Enterprise35%
    Buyer's Guide
    CockroachDB vs. IBM Db2 Database
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about CockroachDB vs. IBM Db2 Database and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CockroachDB is ranked 9th in Relational Databases Tools with 10 reviews while IBM Db2 Database is ranked 6th in Relational Databases Tools with 66 reviews. CockroachDB is rated 8.0, while IBM Db2 Database is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CockroachDB writes "Open source with extensive documentation and a University for training". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Db2 Database writes "Very scalable with high availability and excellent technical support". CockroachDB is most compared with Oracle Database, MySQL, Citus Data, Amazon Aurora and YugabyteDB, whereas IBM Db2 Database is most compared with SQL Server, Oracle Database, SAP HANA, Teradata and Oracle Multitenant. See our CockroachDB vs. IBM Db2 Database report.

    See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.