We performed a comparison between CockroachDB and Oracle Database based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The subset of SQL that my client is using is completely supported."
"The tool's most valuable feature is node syncing, which takes only 0.54 milliseconds."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its resiliency features and the geo-partitioning capabilities."
"The best feature of CockroachDB is the ability to keep the nodes in different locations."
"The product has valuable security features."
"I use CockroachDB to test big data samples and to create the best structure for databases. We have four users and required 10 people for deployment and maintenance."
"The initial setup and deployment are simple."
"CockroachDB is highly reliable."
"It is a reliable database warehouse solution that is transparent to the end user."
"The dashboard may be the best solution for intelligent data management, as well as business intelligence."
"The product provides high availability."
"All of the features offered by Oracle, more than meet the expectations."
"We use Oracle Database to run applications. We use it for our clients' databases and applications."
"It's a very stable solution, especially with the hot backup."
"Oracle Database is fast and easy to use."
"The thing that probably stands out the most about Oracle Database is reliability. I have been working with Oracle Databases for over 25 years, and I have never lost any data due to a machine going down or any events that were not stupid human tricks. I've never lost anybody's data using Oracle. It gets the job done and doesn't fail."
"Cockroach does not support all types of protocols. I need to improve it myself to support a CouchDB on my network."
"The platform could be more extensible."
"The initial setup and pricing could be improved."
"The product must improve its disaster recovery features."
"I find the serverless offer a bit confusing."
"We are looking for more features to support distributed high availability and geo-partitioning."
"CockroachDB needs to improve store processes."
"The closer they can make CockroachDB to being completely compatible with Postgres, the better. It's almost compatible, but not completely. If it was, it would be nice to just be able to use Postgres libraries without any fiddling."
"How you implement or deploy the product can be an area of concern that can be made a bit easier."
"I have contacted the support from Oracle and they are sometimes slow."
"The price tag is very high and most cannot afford it."
"Oracle is very expensive. So if I suggest Oracle to a client, they'll often say it's too costly."
"I'm in Indonesia. From what I know, Ali Cloud has already built a center in Indonesia, and Google also has a data center in Indonesia. I have heard that Amazon will also build a data center in Indonesia, and the same will be with Azure if they deal with the Indonesian government. I'm quite appreciative of what Amazon has done by deciding to have a local data center. I expect Oracle to do the same, but Oracle doesn't seem to have plans to build a data center in Indonesia. This is something that needs to be improved. Oracle should follow all the other cloud providers who see a potential market in Indonesia. It would be better for Oracle to be equal to other cloud providers and have a data center in Indonesia so they can compete. Having a local data center means that they can avoid performance issues, the latency of the network, and all the things that are related to the network for internet-based solutions. Customers in Indonesia expect a local data center."
"Oracle Database could be easier to use."
"If Oracle Database could have more build-in features from some of their other products it would be good."
"We'd like for its price to be a bit lower, both for licensing and support. As it is a top-of-the-line product, it's a bit expensive."
CockroachDB is ranked 9th in Relational Databases Tools with 10 reviews while Oracle Database is ranked 2nd in Relational Databases Tools with 281 reviews. CockroachDB is rated 8.0, while Oracle Database is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of CockroachDB writes "Open source with extensive documentation and a University for training". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Database writes "Supports a large volume of transactions compared to other databases". CockroachDB is most compared with MySQL, Citus Data, Amazon Aurora, SQL Server and MariaDB, whereas Oracle Database is most compared with SAP HANA, SQL Server, MariaDB, IBM Db2 Database and IBM Informix. See our CockroachDB vs. Oracle Database report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
