We performed a comparison between CockroachDB and MariaDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I use CockroachDB to test big data samples and to create the best structure for databases. We have four users and required 10 people for deployment and maintenance."
"CockroachDB is highly reliable."
"The best feature of CockroachDB is the ability to keep the nodes in different locations."
"The tool's most valuable feature is node syncing, which takes only 0.54 milliseconds."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its resiliency features and the geo-partitioning capabilities."
"The initial setup and deployment are simple."
"The subset of SQL that my client is using is completely supported."
"The product has valuable security features."
"The performance is very good."
"It is very simple to install, and the commands are exactly the same as MySQL."
"From the user's perspective, the performance of the columnar queries is very good in terms of the database when comparing it to the Oracle, and MySQL."
"The most valuable feature is that it uses multiple cores, which is better than some of the other databases."
"It's a very easy product to set up."
"It's open source."
"The most valuable feature of MariaDB is the replication mode."
"The solution runs very quickly. It's not slow at all."
"I find the serverless offer a bit confusing."
"The product must improve its disaster recovery features."
"CockroachDB needs to improve store processes."
"The closer they can make CockroachDB to being completely compatible with Postgres, the better. It's almost compatible, but not completely. If it was, it would be nice to just be able to use Postgres libraries without any fiddling."
"Cockroach does not support all types of protocols. I need to improve it myself to support a CouchDB on my network."
"We are looking for more features to support distributed high availability and geo-partitioning."
"The initial setup and pricing could be improved."
"The platform could be more extensible."
"The dashboard and pricing need improvement."
"The price could be less expensive."
"The customer service and support are okay. But the response time is slow. Moreover, the material is not available freely."
"Integration with AWS could be improved."
"It's not very stable. It needs improvement."
"In the next release, I would like to see improvements in the scalability and redundancy features."
"The solution is not scalable."
"Document caching is an area of concern in the product, where improvements are required to help MariaDB improve on the previous queries as they are retained, and you can roll back to them."
CockroachDB is ranked 9th in Relational Databases Tools with 10 reviews while MariaDB is ranked 5th in Relational Databases Tools with 51 reviews. CockroachDB is rated 8.0, while MariaDB is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CockroachDB writes "Open source with extensive documentation and a University for training". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MariaDB writes "Simultaneously use active server capabilities but lacks the maturity ". CockroachDB is most compared with Oracle Database, MySQL, Citus Data, Amazon Aurora and SingleStore, whereas MariaDB is most compared with SQL Server, Oracle Database, PostgreSQL, Firebird SQL and IBM Db2 Database. See our CockroachDB vs. MariaDB report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.