We performed a comparison between CockroachDB and SAP HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The availability and the easy to use feature is the most valuable. The documentation is also good."
"I use CockroachDB to test big data samples and to create the best structure for databases. We have four users and required 10 people for deployment and maintenance."
"The tool's most valuable feature is node syncing, which takes only 0.54 milliseconds."
"CockroachDB is highly reliable."
"The initial setup and deployment are simple."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its resiliency features and the geo-partitioning capabilities."
"The best feature of CockroachDB is the ability to keep the nodes in different locations."
"The product has valuable security features."
"I like the integration process. Also, the data is trusted by our management, and we use the data from transactions for analysis."
"It's user-friendly so long as you use it frequently."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"Using this solution has given us better details for reporting and analytics."
"We've had good experiences with technical support."
"The most valuable feature of SAP HANA is the modeling of the databases."
"What I like most are the dashboards and pervasive analytics."
"The UX experience is very good."
"The platform could be more extensible."
"The initial setup and pricing could be improved."
"CockroachDB needs to improve store processes."
"The product must improve its disaster recovery features."
"The closer they can make CockroachDB to being completely compatible with Postgres, the better. It's almost compatible, but not completely. If it was, it would be nice to just be able to use Postgres libraries without any fiddling."
"I find the serverless offer a bit confusing."
"We are looking for more features to support distributed high availability and geo-partitioning."
"Cockroach does not support all types of protocols. I need to improve it myself to support a CouchDB on my network."
"The surface side or Attack dashboard needs improvement because there are some gaps after sales services."
"Uses a large amount of RAM and is costly."
"They should develop and improve the solution's data management system."
"The user interface and CRM need to be more user-friendly."
"I would like to see improvements in the connectivity of the solution with other BI software. Not every software can connect to it natively."
"SAP HANA is not strong like Oracle when it comes to finance. They are only strong with the logistic business project."
"The solution could improve in the handling of backup data and the administration tools."
"The bid process needs to be improved."
CockroachDB is ranked 9th in Relational Databases Tools with 10 reviews while SAP HANA is ranked 3rd in Relational Databases Tools with 81 reviews. CockroachDB is rated 8.0, while SAP HANA is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of CockroachDB writes "Open source with extensive documentation and a University for training". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "Excellent compatibility between modules and the control". CockroachDB is most compared with Oracle Database, MySQL, Citus Data, Amazon Aurora and Teradata, whereas SAP HANA is most compared with Oracle Database, SQL Server, MySQL, IBM Db2 Database and Apache Spark. See our CockroachDB vs. SAP HANA report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.