We performed a comparison between Codespaces and Docker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Development Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Codespaces' most valuable feature is the repository, which helps the developers to work together. Its data commands are also useful."
"The most valuable features of the solution are Copilot and Advanced Security."
"The product allows us to implement feature-related changes or improvements on time. Whenever I write a section of the code or create a new code, it automatically integrates with the former code."
"Docker packages up an application as a single item that you can then run without the need to install or configure it to work on any specific machine."
"The solution's most valuable feature is the Dockerfile, which makes the life of developers easy. Developers get a real understanding of container creation."
"The solution is easy to install."
"The most valuable feature of Docker is that it revolutionized virtualization by providing a new approach with containers that completely nullified the time it used to take to deploy applications on virtual servers, resulting in deployment times that can be as quick as milliseconds, unless it is a heavy application, such as Java. Additionally, resource utilization has greatly improved with Docker, allowing for more resources to be allocated to other tasks. These are a few key features that make Docker a preferred choice."
"The deployment is quite fast, which is beneficial."
"I have seen end-to-end performance with Docker. It's a great tool, and it's the most popular container service in the market."
"Docker allows you to run multiple virtual machines independently."
"The most valuable feature of Docker is its integration with other solutions, such as KVM and AlmaLinux."
"The technical support could respond faster."
"We get merge conflict errors and need to resolve them."
"The product indicates incorrect statistics."
"The documentation could be improved."
"The runtime and security could improve in Docker. Security is paramount in the cloud and important."
"It could be easier to create images and save them on reports. Just improved development workflow, just quicker, like some better user experience creating the images for the Docker containers."
"We'd like knowledge transfer to be easier."
"We have found that it is not easy to install it into a Windows system."
"Deployment could be quicker."
"I would like to see better management layers."
"Marketing of Docker is one area that needs to improve."
Codespaces is ranked 5th in Development Platforms with 3 reviews while Docker is ranked 2nd in Development Platforms with 40 reviews. Codespaces is rated 8.6, while Docker is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Codespaces writes "Used to integrate into the CI/CD process and streamline the editing and updating of code". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Docker writes "Easy to deploy with an impressive networking feature". Codespaces is most compared with AWS Cloud9, Replit, JetBrains IDEs, RStudio and dbForge Studio for MySQL, whereas Docker is most compared with Mirantis Container Runtime, Rancher Labs, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE and Oracle Application Express (APEX). See our Codespaces vs. Docker report.
See our list of best Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.