Docker vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Docker Logo
1,584 views|1,307 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Nutanix Logo
3,958 views|3,157 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Docker and Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Container Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Docker vs. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE Report (Updated: March 2024).
770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of Docker is the dedicated QA environment for connecting the team members. Additionally, there are many core features available and it is highly secure when we are imaging a client's server.""I have seen end-to-end performance with Docker. It's a great tool, and it's the most popular container service in the market.""The solution is stable.""The most valuable feature of Docker is automation. When I deploy the solution I am confident it will work anywhere. It is reliable and easy to use.""The most valuable feature of Docker is that it revolutionized virtualization by providing a new approach with containers that completely nullified the time it used to take to deploy applications on virtual servers, resulting in deployment times that can be as quick as milliseconds, unless it is a heavy application, such as Java. Additionally, resource utilization has greatly improved with Docker, allowing for more resources to be allocated to other tasks. These are a few key features that make Docker a preferred choice.""The most valuable feature is that it is cost-saving.""The most valuable feature is Docker has a fast learning curve.""The initial setup was easy, and you are only required to run commands."

More Docker Pros →

"The most valuable features of the Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) are its simplicity and efficiency during the initial cluster creation phase.""The technical support is excellent.""We can do a lot of provisioning.""Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.""The solution is embedded in the hypervisor and there are no deployment costs.""The product integrates well with our infrastructure.""The solution is easy to manage. You can get everything in a single platform. It is also easy to work with Terraform as a code.""We can add some add-ons and plugins to the product if we need to."

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE Pros →

Cons
"One item that could be improved is the overall stability of Docker.""I would like to see a more UI-based tool so that students can easily understand it rather than memorizing all of the Docker commands.""I advise new users to review their website, commands, and the steps for creating images.""I have encountered network issues while connecting with microservices. I want to optimize the application layers over the bucket. It should also have better documentation.""They should provide proper documentation to understand the solution's cgroup process.""There is always room for improvement. I often refer to forums such as StackOverflow to learn from other developers' experiences and the challenges they have faced while using Docker.""We'd like knowledge transfer to be easier.""If you install Docker on a host, it creates its own firewalls. It can become an issue. Usually, when you want to install Docker, you need to restart the firewall or restart the active tables on the machine, but this is not the case with Kubernetes. It uses the default set up by the next administrator, but with Docker, you have to restart the firewall and restart Docker before the firewall on the system will be okay. If you do not the rules will not be created."

More Docker Cons →

"We need a backup of production clusters.""I would like to have more nodes for availability and storage.""Areas for improvement in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) include upgrading management capabilities and enhancing the user interface for improved usability.""I have issues with the product's interoperability.""The product lacks some virtualization capabilities, making it an area for improvement where the solution can focus on providing users with more virtualization capabilities related to disk systems.""GUI lacks sufficient information to help with understanding the installation and process.""In the next release, I would like to have automatic dynamic scaling, both upscaling and downscaling.""There have been challenges related to software bugs, especially regarding long-term licensing options and issues within our customer network."

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Docker is a free open-source solution. However, there is the Docker Enterprise which is a paid solution."
  • "There is a license needed to use Docker."
  • "We are using the open-source version of the solution."
  • "Docker is a free open-source solution."
  • "The current cost for us is nothing as an open source."
  • "This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs."
  • "Docker is cost-effective and open-source."
  • "For commercial use, it's about $30 per month. The license itself isn't expensive, but if there are many users, the price becomes high."
  • More Docker Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The product's licenses are included in the software version deployed in our data center."
  • "I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
  • "I rate NKE's pricing a six out of ten."
  • "The platform is averagely priced. I rate the pricing as four out of ten."
  • More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.
    770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We are using Docker to host applications.
    Top Answer:Since Docker is an open-source solution, it is free of cost.
    Top Answer:We are facing multiple issues with the solution's stability.
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of the Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) are its simplicity and efficiency during the initial cluster creation phase.
    Top Answer:Areas for improvement in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) include upgrading management capabilities and enhancing the user interface for improved usability. While basic tasks like cluster creation and… more »
    Top Answer:We utilize NKE to create these clusters, configuring components to meet specific business requirements.
    Ranking
    7th
    Views
    1,584
    Comparisons
    1,307
    Reviews
    40
    Average Words per Review
    394
    Rating
    8.6
    11th
    Views
    3,958
    Comparisons
    3,157
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    366
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Nutanix Karbon
    Learn More
    Overview

    Docker takes away repetitive, mundane configuration tasks and is used throughout the development lifecycle for fast, easy and portable application development – desktop and cloud. Docker’s comprehensive end to end platform includes UIs, CLIs, APIs and security that are engineered to work together across the entire application delivery lifecycle.

    Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) is an enterprise Kubernetes management solution that simplifies provisioning, operations, and lifecycle management of Kubernetes.
    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Energy/Utilities Company13%
    Non Profit9%
    Educational Organization9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Insurance Company11%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Government8%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm38%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Insurance Company13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Government8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise56%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise62%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business60%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise20%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise62%
    Buyer's Guide
    Docker vs. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Docker vs. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Docker is ranked 7th in Container Management with 40 reviews while Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE is ranked 11th in Container Management with 9 reviews. Docker is rated 8.6, while Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Docker writes "Easy to deploy with an impressive networking feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE writes "Stable platform with an easy initial setup process ". Docker is most compared with Mirantis Container Runtime, Rancher Labs, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, AWS Cloud Development Kit (CDK) and Codespaces, whereas Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE is most compared with OpenShift Container Platform, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Kubernetes, NGINX Ingress Controller and Amazon EKS. See our Docker vs. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE report.

    See our list of best Container Management vendors.

    We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.