Collibra Governance vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Collibra Logo
14,176 views|6,429 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
26,458 views|12,884 comparisons
82% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Mar 6, 2024

We compared Collibra Governance and Microsoft Purview based on our user's reviews in several parameters.

Collibra Governance is praised for its data lineage and quality management, excellent customer service, reasonable pricing, and positive return on investment. However, users have highlighted areas of improvement in the user interface, scalability, and integration. On the other hand, Microsoft Purview is valued for its robust data cataloging and collaboration features, competitive pricing, and positive ROI. Users appreciate its user-friendly interface and seamless integration with Microsoft products but seek enhancements in functionality, data classification, and integration capabilities.

Features: Collibra Governance's valuable features include effective data asset management, centralized data view, compliance support, user-friendly interface, customizability, integration capabilities, data lineage, and data quality management. Microsoft Purview offers effective data asset management, comprehensive data view, data governance support, collaboration features, robust data cataloging and discovery capabilities, user-friendly interface, and seamless integration with other Microsoft products and services.

Pricing and ROI: Collibra Governance and Microsoft Purview both receive positive feedback on their pricing structure and setup costs. Users find Collibra's pricing reasonable, while Microsoft Purview offers competitive pricing. Both products have flexible licensing options. Collibra has a straightforward setup process, while Microsoft Purview has a comparatively low setup cost, making implementation smooth., Collibra Governance and Microsoft Purview both provide a positive ROI. However, Collibra emphasizes the value in managing governance processes and ensuring data quality, while Purview focuses on enhancing data governance and accelerating analytics processes. Collibra users mention improved decision-making, while Purview users appreciate cost savings and seamless integration.

Room for Improvement: Collibra Governance could enhance its user interface, scalability, data classification capabilities, integration with other systems, and availability of comprehensive training and documentation. In comparison, Microsoft Purview needs improvements in functionality, user-friendliness, data classification, search filters, integration with other Microsoft products, collaboration features, and data ingestion processes.

Deployment and customer support: Based on user feedback, the duration required for establishing a new tech solution varies for Collibra Governance. Some users took three months for deployment and an extra week for setup, while others took a week for both. For Microsoft Purview, users had different experiences, with some spending three months on deployment and a week on setup, while others only required a week for both phases., Customers have expressed satisfaction with the customer service and support provided by Collibra Governance. They commend the company for their helpful and prompt assistance, as well as their knowledgeable support team. Collibra Governance prioritizes providing excellent customer service. Meanwhile, users of Microsoft Purview have also expressed satisfaction with the customer service and support they received. The assistance was deemed helpful, responsive, and effectively catered to their needs.

The summary above is based on 67 interviews we conducted recently with Collibra Governance and Microsoft Purview users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.

To learn more, read our detailed Collibra Governance vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance Report (Updated: March 2024).
771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It enables a linear view of the data assets across different levels, providing a comprehensive understanding.""The beauty of the solution is that you can customize it quite a bit.""It helps us build a powerful workflow mechanism where there can be any stewardship, including issue management governing assets using policies, regulations, or business rules.""Workflows is the most valuable feature of Collibra because we will typically use an interface for it and we can customize it as per our needs.""I like Collibra's flexibility. I like to be able to modify things for our own use. For example, we've chosen to use Collibra also as a knowledge management tool, even though it is not designed to be a knowledge management tool. That's the beauty of it. It can serve as a knowledge management tool by creating some custom assets specifically for knowledge management.""The solution has good workflows and is based on AIML.""Workflow is very helpful and assessment are good features. I really like the structure of this solution and how it is compartmentalized.""Collibra Governance comes with a lot of features, and we have used it in one of our projects for metadata management and data lineage."

More Collibra Governance Pros →

"The most significant value lies in its seamless integration into the Azure ecosystem, automating various processes and reducing operational burdens.""It starts off with records management, insider risk management, and information protection. And there is the discovery of the clouds, and we can get analytics on that as well, so that we know which user is using which cloud application and for how much time. The Activity explorer tells us which user was transferring out what data at what moment and on which device, including the serial number.""You can set up automated dates to alert on internal data.""The ability to classify data quickly and effortlessly is arguably Microsoft Purview's most valuable feature.""Instead of having to manually write down which tables and columns exist and then describe them, you can do that process in one go, by simply connecting to a source. That's a huge time-saver and a great benefit of Purview.""MIP also provides strong information rights management settings, such as the ability to specify who has access to content and at what time.""I think Purview does as good a job...I'll say that it is as stable as the data governance maturity that exists within an organization. It can't be more stable than that.""Purview helps mitigate risk and allows us to govern the information being shared among apps and devices."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance Pros →

Cons
"Occasionally we get little bugs that occur, however, this is typical.""It should have more integrations with things like CyberArk because its main purpose is GDPR implementation. We have to have more scope for things that implement more privacy. CyberArk makes sure your credentials are vaulted and your things are secure when you're creating your integrations or connecting to an application. I do believe that they are working on this feature.""There are certain processes that involve a lot of manual work, specifically when searching for attributes assignment. It would be better if we could do this via APIs.""The solution's metadata management is pretty novice and could be improved.""The interface is not very user-friendly and can be difficult to navigate.""It would be better if there was a way to import all data and metadata in an automatic way in one block form.""No easy way to connect to different data sources.""We had issues during setup."

More Collibra Governance Cons →

"Another area for improvement is in managing the business glossary terms. If they could provide the same type of method that we use to configure the scan rule sets, that would be helpful. Currently, there is no option like this, so we have to do it manually. Automatic detection would be great.""I lose a little bit of that control when we're talking about third-party connectors. Compliance-wise, I would like to see more ability to audit from a user perspective, where I could extrapolate what the user was thinking or trying to do.""Although you can explore the data, that creates a great interest in data lineage or the data flow. How does it go from a source to a platform to a Power BI report, for example? It is possible, to some extent, to see that with Purview, but the lineage feature requires some manual work on the development side or more work from Microsoft to improve on it.""It could reduce pricing to encourage usage.""One drawback of Microsoft Purview, though it's beneficial and easy to use, is that when you start plugging in connectors for third-party sources when setting the solution up for data collection, it becomes a bit more tricky.""Frequent daily updates from Microsoft can cause interface elements like buttons to appear and disappear, making navigation unpredictable.""I have some concerns about the separation of roles in Purview from the Microsoft tenant, as well as how they interact with the security portal and endpoint manager.""Enhancing the tool's capability to connect to multiple sources would be valuable."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I am not so much aware of price details. Initially, there was an add-on NuSoft license to use the DVC connector that NuSoft gives to create integrations, but Collibra is now phasing out of it slowly. Collibra is cutting ties with them is what we have been led to believe, and we have started developing on Spring Boot, which is open source."
  • "I think it is on a yearly basis, but I'm not involved with the pricing session, so I have no idea. There are several licenses for different models. You get one license per product, but a lot of features are controlled separately through different licenses. So, as and when you want to use a feature, you have to procure the license for that feature."
  • "I think they have a trust issue. I did not like the way they recently went through the process. They were like, "Finish this SOW first, only then will we sign the other SOW." Or, "Finish this code." I didn't like that much."
  • "I would say it's probably in line with what other vendors charge for licensing."
  • "It is substantial, and we do pay yearly."
  • "There are different levels of licenses. For example, some users can only do read-only licenses, and others have the stewardship license where they can give access to users."
  • "Collibra Governance is expensive - I would rate its pricing as one out of five."
  • "Collibra provides you with a license based on the subscription model that you purchase."
  • More Collibra Governance Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing is moderate. It's not too expensive, but it's not the most competitive."
  • "Microsoft Purview is the best option I have encountered when it comes to price. Maybe some of my information is outdated, but Microsoft offered it so that you could use it almost without paying."
  • "There is some competition out there, but the other solutions are quite expensive. They are enterprise tools that are a bit more mature but the license costs $100,000 for some of them. Purview is pay-per-use and a lot of companies are interested in that."
  • "Aside from the complexity of the pricing model, the price itself is realistic. Features like AI components and automatic classification require additional licenses. Still, anyone can start using Purview with a basic E3 license if they're using Microsoft 365 and grow with additional licenses as needed. Overall, we're satisfied with the price."
  • "Its pricing is good in terms of the features that they are providing, but there are many competitors in the market who can easily provide you with similar services at a lesser cost."
  • "The categorization within the licensing could be improved. There are a lot of solutions within Microsoft Purview. If the licensing could be a bit clearer and the solutions could be better categorized according to function and across multiple environments, that would be excellent. The licensing is very confusing."
  • "Price-wise, I think it's very generous and accessible to not just enterprises but small to medium-sized companies as well. I think it's very fair in terms of how they break apart the storage and the actual computing, and that makes it very accessible. So, that is a very big plus for Purview."
  • "Some people find the tier licensing system complicated, but it offers a lot of value for money if we use the features."
  • More Microsoft Purview Data Governance Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We use the solution's Data Stewardship part.
    Top Answer:We are not able to ingest all the data in Collibra, and that's why we cannot do element-to-element level data tracking.
    Top Answer:It is designed to seamlessly connect to various data sources, which is particularly beneficial for our customers who primarily use Microsoft technologies.
    Top Answer:Currently, the licensing differs for the governance side compared to the risk and compliance side. On the governance side, the charges are based on the usage of Purview, including the data map, data… more »
    Top Answer:Data quality has been a highly requested feature among customers. While it was initially scheduled for release in December last year, I anticipate that this feature will be available soon this year. I… more »
    Ranking
    2nd
    out of 57 in Data Governance
    Views
    14,176
    Comparisons
    6,429
    Reviews
    21
    Average Words per Review
    482
    Rating
    7.6
    1st
    out of 57 in Data Governance
    Views
    26,458
    Comparisons
    12,884
    Reviews
    45
    Average Words per Review
    1,368
    Rating
    7.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Collibra
    Microsoft Purview, MS Azure Purview
    Learn More
    Microsoft
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Collibra Governance is a software solution for data governance, which refers to the set of policies, standards, and processes that govern how an organization manages, uses, and protects its data. Collibra Governance provides a centralized platform for managing data governance, enabling organizations to ensure data accuracy, completeness, and security.

    The software includes tools for managing data lineage, data dictionaries, and metadata, as well as for monitoring data quality and compliance with data governance policies. It also provides a collaboration platform for stakeholders to work together on data governance initiatives, ensuring that data governance is integrated into the organization's data management processes.

    Collibra Governance is designed for organizations of all sizes, from small businesses to large enterprises, and can be used across a variety of industries and use cases. It is a cloud-based solution that can be easily implemented and integrated into an organization's existing data management infrastructure.

    Collibra Governance Features

    Collibra Governance has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Data governance management: The solution has a centralized platform for managing data governance policies, standards, and processes.
    • Data lineage: Collibra Governance includes traceability of data from source to consumption, providing insight into data relationships and dependencies.
    • Data dictionaries and metadata management: With its management of data definitions and metadata, organizations can understand and manage their data assets more efficiently.
    • Data quality management: The solution’s monitoring of data quality and consistency, enables organizations to ensure data accuracy and completeness.
    • Compliance management: Through its tracking of data governance compliance and enforcement of policies, Collibra Governance helps organizations reduce the risk of non-compliance.
    • Collaboration and communication: The Collibra Governance platform encourages collaboration between stakeholders involved in data governance initiatives.
    • Data catalog: Collibra Governance has a centralized repository for data assets, making it easier for users to discover and access data.
    • Integration: The solution supports integration with other data management tools, such as data warehouses, big data platforms, and data quality tools.
    • Analytics and reporting: Collibra Governance includes analysis and reporting of data governance metrics and KPIs, allowing organizations to monitor and improve their data governance processes.

    Collibra Governance Benefits

    There are many benefits to implementing Collibra Governance. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

    • Improved data accuracy and quality: The solution’s centralized management of data governance processes helps reduce the risk of data errors and improves data quality.
    • Increased data security: With Collibra Governance, users are more protected from data breaches.
    • Better decision making: Improved visibility into data relationships and dependencies, enables organizations to make informed decisions based on accurate and complete data.
    • Collaboration: The solution helps encourage teamwork and better communication.
    • Improved data management: Collibra Governance offers centralized management of data assets, making it easier for organizations to manage and understand their data.
    • Increased efficiency: Collibra Governance’s automation of data governance processes, reduces manual effort and increases efficiency.
    • Improved reporting and analytics: Analysis and reporting of data governance metrics and KPIs enables organizations to monitor and improve their data governance processes.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Collibra Governance is a solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Some of its major advantages are that it has good data lineage, is easy to use, and has good customization capabilities in addition to many other great features.

    A Sr. Systems Analyst, Master Data Governance at a manufacturing company expresses, “[The solution has] good data lineage and is surrounded by a helpful community.”

    “[It’s] easy to use with good customization capabilities and great features,” says a Senior Consulting Analyst at a construction company.

    According to Kriti T., Senior Manager, Service Design Manager at a pharma/biotech company, “The solution lets me associate the right people with the right assets, so anybody who has to look at end-to-end instances can use Collibra Governance and figure it out in terms of who to contact, what to do, and where to find what you need.”

    The new Microsoft Purview portal offers an enhanced governance experience, serving as a unified platform for managing and governing data across various sources, including Azure, Microsoft 365, on-premises, and multicloud environments. Designed to streamline governance, compliance, risk, and security efforts, the new portal provides a user-friendly interface and unlocks advanced features like live view and preset scans. Existing users of Microsoft Purview can upgrade to this enhanced experience, gaining access to improved user interface, enhanced capabilities, and consolidated management of data assets. Additionally, the upgrade sets the stage for future developments, including account consolidation and fine-grained access control.

    Sample Customers
    Ministry of Economy Science and Innovation, Aspen Insurance, Barry Callebaut, Colt
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm29%
    Pharma/Biotech Company14%
    Insurance Company10%
    Healthcare Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Healthcare Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Non Profit8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Government9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise67%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise72%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business34%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise46%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    Collibra Governance vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Collibra Governance vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Collibra Governance is ranked 2nd in Data Governance with 41 reviews while Microsoft Purview Data Governance is ranked 1st in Data Governance with 48 reviews. Collibra Governance is rated 7.6, while Microsoft Purview Data Governance is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Collibra Governance writes "Transformed our cross-functional business teams into one enterprise-facing view". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Purview Data Governance writes "User friendly with good documentation but needs to cover more non-Microsoft use cases". Collibra Governance is most compared with Informatica Axon, Alation Data Catalog, BigID, Ataccama ONE Platform and erwin Data Intelligence by Quest, whereas Microsoft Purview Data Governance is most compared with Alation Data Catalog, Varonis Platform, Informatica Axon, Microsoft Intune and Collibra Lineage. See our Collibra Governance vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance report.

    See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

    We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.