We performed a comparison between CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and Trellix Endpoint Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager (EPM) 's most valuable feature is its ability to manage user application privileges and protect against ransomware attacks by controlling access to specific files and applications."
"We can do both server and endpoint protection."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is very easy to manage, which I like. The solution also has a dashboard where you can see which software is suspicious, which I find valuable."
"The most valuable features of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager are password management, session management, onboarding rules, platform customization, and safety management."
"The most valuable feature is that it does lifecycle management and that it will change to whatever the end target is."
"The solution allows me to give access and privileges to each user individually"
"Users can scale the solution."
"The loss prevention feature would be the most valuable."
"It has been protecting us for many years, and we hope it will continue to do so for many years to come."
"The solution includes a good combination of features for both signature and signature-less."
"Initially, the DLP was very valuable for disabling access to USB drives."
"Dynamic Application Containment."
"We receive good protection with this solution."
"It's easy to use."
"It has improved my organization because it helps with visibility, in terms of security. We can see the actual attack and can contain it. The antivirus can detect that."
"For an experienced system implementer it will take approximately one day. However, for somebody who is inexperienced it may take up to five days."
"The product's threat protection and defense capabilities need enhancement."
"Can be improved by allowing computers to be excluded from policies."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager can be better by making its UI more consistent."
"The solution can be complex to use at times."
"It cannot be on-prem. It is only cloud-based. Sometimes, that's a restriction in terms of usage."
"Technical support is slow to respond when we run into issues."
"Performance could be better. We have a couple of problems with CyberArk right now. One of the problems is performance in our environment. Support also takes a long time to respond. If the user already has local admin rights, then I can't collect any events in the console from this device. There are also some options in CyberArk that are not working properly, and are not helpful in this case. I can't collect any information to create a proper policy for the device. I have to investigate everything manually, or even disable the local admin from the device. I can collect the events only after this, and it's very time consuming. In my case, it's a waste of resources."
"Technical support is an area that can be improved because sometimes, the response time is a bit slow and the explanation is short."
"I would like to see more integration with third-party products."
"I've encountered minor challenges related to encryption."
"The solution should provide a more easy way to uninstall it on specific stations."
"It would be nice if the solution were to allow not just on-cloud management, but on-premises, as well."
"We don't like the solution since it requires much memory consumption and consumes much CPU resources."
"The initial setup isn't so easy. You need to know what you are doing."
"An area in need of improvement involves the overview, which usually does not enable one to get the value in reports."
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is ranked 6th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 27 reviews while Trellix Endpoint Security is ranked 10th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 94 reviews. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is rated 8.0, while Trellix Endpoint Security is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager writes "Offers integrated solutions and expands its capabilities through strategic acquisitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security writes "Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services". CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, CrowdStrike Falcon, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and BigFix, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Trend Micro Deep Security. See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Trellix Endpoint Security report.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.