We performed a comparison between Trellix Endpoint Security and Trend Micro Deep Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)."The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"Additionally, when it comes to EDR, there are more tools available to assist with client work."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"Exceptions are easy to create and the interface is easy to follow with a nice appearance."
"The main thing is that I feel safe. Because the processes that have been used to get a handle on the attackers are much better than other competitors"
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts."
"The performance is good."
"One valuable feature is Threat Prevention with the on-demand scan."
"Trellix Security Endpoint can promptly isolate any host machines directly from the console. If alerts are received and isolation is necessary, it can be accomplished through the console. The console itself holds significant value, accessible through a browser and allowing remote actions via cloud login."
"I think the costing is fine compared to other products. Cost-wise you definitely get value for your money."
"Trellix Endpoint Security's dashboard is very flexible, and I can create my own user-specific dashboard depending on user privilege or preference."
"Threat prevention is valuable because most clients use other solutions like antivirus as part of web protection. I don't find that kind of solution useful."
"The loss prevention feature would be the most valuable."
"There is a degree of set it and forget it in regards to the actual endpoints and what you can do with the console, which is nice."
"It helps with virtual patching and IDS fetching."
"The initial setup was straightforward and we didn't have any problem with it."
"The vulnerability scanning reduces false positives by quite a bit."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"One of the most valuable features is that it's a firewall-based solution. We just open the required reports to the server—to server communication—and that's how we use Deep Security."
"The tool provides information on server activities and hosts."
"You can scale the solution to different versions."
"The solution is not stable."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"Everything with Fortinet having to do with their cloud services. They need to invest more in their internal infrastructure that they are running in the cloud. One of the things I find with their cloud environment compared to others' is that they go cheap on the equipment. So it causes some performance degradation."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"Detections could be improved."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"The support needs improvement."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"With McAfee, if there is a zero-day vulnerability, you have to download the patch for it from the McAfee website, then apply it to your endpoint."
"Tech support is not as helpful as they were in the past."
"When it runs in the background of the endpoint, the devices get slowed down for some applications."
"We know that McAfee isn't the best antivirus and it can't protect us 100%, although we are okay with the level of protection that it gives us."
"The initial setup isn't so easy. You need to know what you are doing."
"There are more secure featured solutions from McAfee on the market but for smaller companies like ours, they are too expensive."
"The VirusScan needs to improve in order to detect ransomware and other advanced threats."
"The initial setup is complex. It is a very complex product. You must have experience with it."
"Requires simplification, a fair amount of trouble shooting required."
"The cost is very high."
"The solution could use more integration."
"We'd like to have more application control."
"We have had some issues when it drains some of the resources of the server."
"We'd like to see extended capacity in the on-premises versions."
"Their automation needs improvement."
"Some of the reporting and integrations could be more robust."
Trellix Endpoint Security is ranked 10th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 94 reviews while Trend Micro Deep Security is ranked 1st in Virtualization Security with 80 reviews. Trellix Endpoint Security is rated 8.0, while Trend Micro Deep Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security writes "Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Deep Security writes "Offers excellent endpoint protection and great stability ". Trellix Endpoint Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Cisco Secure Endpoint, whereas Trend Micro Deep Security is most compared with Trend Micro Apex One, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Symantec Endpoint Security and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.