We performed a comparison between Cybereason Next-Generation Antivirus and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, ESET and others in Anti-Malware Tools."The solution's most valuable feature is its AI detection algorithm part, which helps and is Cybereason's way of detecting the unknown, not just the signature-based threats."
"Coming from an organization where the EDR wasn't strong, it has always been a case of basically searching through the information you already have and looking for something. It was basically trying to find the needle in a haystack. What the Defender platform does is that it reduces the size of the haystack, and it'll say that the needle is over here. Minutes matter, and it certainly zeros you in on the events that are concerning. It also simplifies the effort of trying to get some kind of correlation of behaviors or actions you see in the environment and confirming if something is benign or a threat."
"It's a Microsoft product; it's easier to deploy this product than other options."
"Its real-time security is the most valuable."
"Offers good protection."
"We use Microsoft Defender for the antivirus."
"Defender for Endpoint provides good visibility into threats and has favorable threat intelligence."
"We had Norton Antivirus before, and with Norton, we didn't have a way to centrally manage a lot of features. Defender allowed us to deploy it from our Office 365 admin console. That is probably the biggest thing that made us go with Defender."
"The most valuable features are that it's easy to use and the updates are very simple."
"Integrating other tools is sometimes an issue when using Cybereason Next-Generation Antivirus."
"It would be helpful if they included XDR features, on top of the EDR functionality."
"The GUI is very complex and could be more user friendly."
"This solution is not secure, which is why I have moved to Linux."
"The documentation could be better. When they update their manuals, sometimes they refer to products by their old names, so it is a little confusing. For example, the documentation might still say "Advanced Threat Protection" instead of Defender for Endpoint."
"Microsoft Defender for Endpoint can use more advertising to promote their features."
"They can improve it on the online protection front since people nowadays are moving online and working from home."
"Microsoft Defender for Endpoint could improve by providing more user-friendly dashboards. They may be complicated for some."
"The price, in general, could always be a little bit cheaper."
More Cybereason Next-Generation Antivirus Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cybereason Next-Generation Antivirus is ranked 21st in Anti-Malware Tools with 1 review while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is ranked 1st in Anti-Malware Tools with 182 reviews. Cybereason Next-Generation Antivirus is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cybereason Next-Generation Antivirus writes "With great technical support and reasonable scalability options, the tool efficiently detects unknown threats". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint writes "Eliminates the need to look at multiple dashboards by automatically providing one XDR dashboard to show the security score of each subscription". Cybereason Next-Generation Antivirus is most compared with ESET PROTECT Enterprise, whereas Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is most compared with Symantec Endpoint Security, Intercept X Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, CrowdStrike Falcon and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
See our list of best Anti-Malware Tools vendors.
We monitor all Anti-Malware Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
