We performed a comparison between Cymulate and Verodin based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)."The most valuable feature for us is the zero-day."
"The reporting capabilities are very good."
"The solution is constantly updating. Their data and security validation are cutting-edge."
"The product must provide consultancy for initial setup."
"The reporting process requires significant improvement as it often takes longer than expected and the quality is lacking."
"The integration engine needs to improve."
Earn 20 points
Cymulate is ranked 2nd in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 2 reviews while Verodin is ranked 10th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Cymulate is rated 9.0, while Verodin is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Cymulate writes "An affordable solution that improves an organization’s security posture and provides excellent reporting capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Verodin writes "Stable with good updates but needs a better integration engine". Cymulate is most compared with Pentera, Picus Security, XM Cyber, SafeBreach and SCYTHE, whereas Verodin is most compared with Picus Security, AttackIQ, Pentera and SafeBreach.
See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.
We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
