Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Pentera Logo
4,996 views|3,306 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Trellix Logo
942 views|472 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Pentera and Verodin based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS).
To learn more, read our detailed Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of Pentera is that you can do continuous vulnerability assessment, which is automated.""What I like the most about Pentera is its solution-oriented approach.""The vulnerability scanner, exploit achievements, and remediation actions are all great.""Maybe there are some remediation steps on the website, we can mask sensitive information on the website better.""The product is easy to use."

More Pentera Pros →

"The solution is constantly updating. Their data and security validation are cutting-edge."

More Verodin Pros →

Cons
"The price could be improved.""Pentera's general dashboards could be improved and made more specific in terms of vulnerabilities that I'm discovering.""The vulnerability scanner, exploit achievements, and remediation actions are all great.""There is room for improvement in virtualization compatibility.""Maybe scalability. I know that the Pentera right now is high level in order to scan big deals over 500 IPs and not less, and not less. That can be more granular. This will be useful."

More Pentera Cons →

"The integration engine needs to improve."

More Verodin Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We have to pay a yearly licensing cost for Pentera."
  • "It's not that expensive, but it could be more cost-effective."
  • More Pentera Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions are best for your needs.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:What I like the most about Pentera is its solution-oriented approach.
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in virtualization compatibility. Testing with virtual servers didn't yield the same results as on-premises services, and the vendor's support was limited in addressing… more »
    Top Answer:I have used Pentera as an automation tool both for customers and within my organization.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    4,996
    Comparisons
    3,306
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    393
    Rating
    8.3
    Views
    942
    Comparisons
    472
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Cymulate logo
    Compared 19% of the time.
    Tenable Nessus logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Horizon3.ai logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    Picus Security logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Qualys VMDR logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Picus Security logo
    Compared 26% of the time.
    AttackIQ logo
    Compared 22% of the time.
    Cymulate logo
    Compared 18% of the time.
    SafeBreach logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview

    Pentera is the category leader for Automated Security Validation, allowing every organization to evaluate its security readiness, to know its real security risk at any given moment. Test all cybersecurity layers across the attack surface – inside and out – by safely emulating attacks & prioritize patching with a risk-based remediation roadmap.

    Thousands of security professionals and service providers around the world use Pentera to guide remediation and close security gaps before they are exploited. For more info visit: pentera.io

    Equipped with FireEye frontline intelligence, the Verodin platform will measure and test security environments against both known and newly discovered threats, empowering organizations to identify risks in their security controls before a breach occurs, and rapidly adapt their defenses to the evolving threat landscape.

    Sample Customers
    Blackstone Group Caterpillar Apria Healthcare Taylor Vinters Sandler Capital Management Drawbridge BNP Paribas British Red Cross
    AAFCU, Amuse, Axway, Bank Gutmann, Bank of Thailand, BCC Corporation, Blackboat, CapWealth Advisors, CBC, CERN, Lagardère, Land Bank of the Philippines, laya healthcare, Lindsay Automotive Group
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm28%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Updated: May 2024.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Pentera is ranked 1st in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 5 reviews while Verodin is ranked 10th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Pentera is rated 8.2, while Verodin is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Pentera writes "A stable solution that can be used to do continuous and automated vulnerability assessments". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Verodin writes "Stable with good updates but needs a better integration engine". Pentera is most compared with Cymulate, Tenable Nessus, Horizon3.ai, Picus Security and Qualys VMDR, whereas Verodin is most compared with Picus Security, AttackIQ, Cymulate and SafeBreach.

    See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.

    We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.