We performed a comparison between DarwinBox and Oracle HCM Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Talent Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution that we used previously was very complex. As a result, without referring to the manuals and consulting an expert, it was difficult for a newly hired employee to navigate the platform. However, this is not the case with Darwinbox. It has a very intuitive user interface, and anyone can use it and implement it without having to use a guide or a walk through process. It's very simple."
"The most valuable features of the solution are organogram and position-based mapping."
"In our company, we use DarwinBox to maintain the data of our employees and for recruitment purposes."
"All the features are good."
"The application design is beautiful."
"I like the interfaces, and they are fine. I would like to see more interfaces."
"HCM solution that's easy to set up and scale, with good data integration and technical support."
"The most valuable features in Oracle HCM Cloud are the employee and manager self-services."
"It is very user-friendly. Most of the UI is very intuitive so you don't need to follow a course to follow it up."
"The most valuable features of Oracle HCM Cloud are the easy ability to customize the solution and applications. Additionally, the solution updates the solution"
"In general, functionality is fine."
"Like most software, it has a base version, the vanilla, out-of-the-box version, and customization is required to match it to the unique processes of each company. The Darwinbox team seems to be having difficulty with the customization process. They have to be a little more mature to customize it as per every company's need."
"DarwinBox is not a stable solution...DarwinBox is not a scalable solution."
"The solution's API integration with third-party applications should be improved."
"In some cases, the price may be lower depending on what is negotiated."
"Product integration, particularly with collaboration tools, is lacking in this solution."
"The solution has much room for improvement in all the modules."
"In the next release, I would like to see a new recruitments module. I would like to see the preboarding so that it sends out integrations through personal email. That would be very useful."
"Lacks relevancy for the current generation."
"Oracle HCM Cloud could improve by adding AI and more offline capabilities."
"Occasionally there are problems with stability."
"Exposure to users on the volume or utilization of servers and memory is necessary. Currently, when users hit the threshold, the system experiences a slowdown."
DarwinBox is ranked 21st in Talent Management with 3 reviews while Oracle HCM Cloud is ranked 3rd in Talent Management with 63 reviews. DarwinBox is rated 6.4, while Oracle HCM Cloud is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of DarwinBox writes "Has a very intuitive user interface and a fairly smooth implementation process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle HCM Cloud writes " Capable of consolidating data from all countries and providing access to any employee information across locations but poor user experience". DarwinBox is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, ZingHR, PeopleStrong , Workday and Ramco HCM, whereas Oracle HCM Cloud is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, PeopleSoft, Workday, SAP HCM and Oracle E-Business Suite. See our DarwinBox vs. Oracle HCM Cloud report.
See our list of best Talent Management vendors, best HR Analytics Software vendors, and best Talent Acquisition vendors.
We monitor all Talent Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.