We performed a comparison between Datadog and DX Unified Infrastructure Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The tools are powerful and intuitive to set up."
"The ease of correcting these dashboards and widgets when needed is amazing."
"It is easy to implement and scale applications with standardized visibility, monitoring and alerting"
"The full stack of integrations made it easier to monitor the different technologies and platform providers, including Software as a Service providers, that otherwise would need a lot of work and customization to be able to see what is happening."
"Its integration is most valuable because you can integrate it with various service providers such as AWS, .Net, etc."
"For us to have visibility into our app stack and the hardware we run has been highly beneficial."
"Since we integrated Datadog, we have had increased confidence in the quality of our service, and we had an easier time increasing our delivery velocity."
"I find the greatest feature is being able to search across logs from various microservices."
"It gives us visibility inside applications. It helps us to dig down and find the root cause of any issue within the network."
"Great customized dashboards and drill down reports with auto serve analytics."
"It's easy to push out across numerous servers. Very scalable."
"It is reliable when it comes to monitoring."
"It is easy to implement but requires good planning."
"You can integrate clouds, hybrid infrastructure, and on-premise infrastructure into one product."
"The feature that we've found to be very helpful is the way the solution categorizes the devices to identify groups, groups of devices and clusters. This allows us to be aware of their position within the topology."
"It is the foundation for our monitoring solution."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"If there were a more cost-effective manner of deploying the tool, we'd be more likely to adopt it more widely."
"The error traceability is an area that can be improved."
"I found the solution to be stable, I did not experience any bugs or glitches. However, some of the managing team did."
"The way data is represented can be limiting. When I first tried it out a long time ago, you could graph a metric and another metric, and they'd overlay, but you couldn't take the ratio between the two."
"It would also be nice if we had more insight into our own usage of Datadog (agents and custom metrics). They provide a usage page which does help, but it is not in real-time."
"The incident management beta looks promising, but it is still missing the ability to automatically create incidents based on certain alerts."
"We would really like to see more from the Service Catalog."
"For three to four months, we have been experiencing real-time delays. For example, if we're monitoring incoming traffic, the real-time status should be displayed up to a certain point. However, due to delays or issues with Datadog, the real-time data might only be updated at an earlier time. We are experiencing consistent delays in data updates from Datadog, with the most recent data often being delayed by about an hour. This issue has been ongoing for the past four months."
"I think it can be improved by a greater provision of specialized technical support, as there are very few trained personnel there."
"The biggest feature that I've been hoping they would enhance on is inventory management: things like adding/removing nodes."
"There should be wider coverage of storage infrastructure."
"A useful feature to have would be automatic configuration per standard by new robots that check in for any particular customer."
"CA UIM needs some improvement with performance reporting (if we compare it to CA eHealth)."
"How we can get more native information from CA's solutions."
"In the UMP, certain devices will show up multiple times and they don't correlate correctly. That's one of the issues."
"Stability."
More DX Unified Infrastructure Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Datadog is ranked 1st in Cloud Monitoring Software with 137 reviews while DX Unified Infrastructure Management is ranked 25th in Cloud Monitoring Software with 120 reviews. Datadog is rated 8.6, while DX Unified Infrastructure Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of DX Unified Infrastructure Management writes "Easy to set up, simple to use, and offers great technical support". Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and AppDynamics, whereas DX Unified Infrastructure Management is most compared with DX SaaS, DX Spectrum, SCOM, ManageEngine OpManager and SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor. See our DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Datadog report.
See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors, best Network Monitoring Software vendors, and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.