We performed a comparison between Device42 and JIRA Service Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, BMC, Freshworks and others in IT Asset Management."It has agentless discovery; you don't need to put agents on your servers. You can open one or two ports to discover all your infrastructure."
"The most valuable part is the ease of use. There's no training involved. It's pretty simple and straightforward."
"The asset inventory is great because previously we had devices all over the place. We have been able to do multiscans to find devices that we didn't know about, which was great."
"The auto-discovery is brilliant. You can have it scheduled to run on a regular basis, and the infrastructure is always getting updated within the platform. I would rate the asset discovery very highly. It's very comprehensive. It covers quite a lot of different methods for doing discovery and it supports a lot of different types of hardware as well."
"The solution is agentless."
"The IP address tracking [is valuable]... We have a lot of different devices and some of them have many IP addresses, so keeping track of which ones are assigned where is very critical for putting new devices on the network and giving them new addresses. All of our devices are statically assigned, so if we don't keep good records then we could accidentally assign a duplicate, which would cause problems on the network."
"The reporting part is valuable. You have classic reports, and you can also do advanced reporting. They also have the DOQL feature for queries. You can write SQL queries to get your data and create custom reports."
"The Insights+ component is useful for us because it does business application mapping and helps us visualize it. It saves us time because we don't have to hunt for data."
"JIRA Service Management is a very user-friendly solution."
"JSM's best feature is the integration with other Jira products."
"Jira lets us customize the workflow to meet our requirements. The email and alert features are also handy."
"Easy to use and user-friendly."
"Customizations are most valuable. The customization of workflows is the main power of the Atlassian tools in general."
"One of the best features is that I can share tickets with team members, at which point any team member is able to pick one up and work on it."
"We use JIRA Service Management for tracking purposes, planning, and execution."
"Jira Service Management is flexible. It is easy to navigate without requiring extra learning. The user experience has been good."
"A con for Device42 is that Kubernetes integration is lacking. You pay for 10,000 spot licenses and if you're spinning up a Kubernetes cluster, or four or five or six Kubernetes clusters like we do, you're going to have 5,000 or 6,000 nodes in each of those, doing different types of business things."
"The reporting could be better. The Insights+ component is an improvement, but they even admit it isn't the greatest. The documentation on their website could also be improved, but Device42 is constantly changing, so the documentation would have to change almost daily."
"The resources table needs a few tweaks. We've raised a feature request for this. When you click on resources, it opens up the entire CMDB or the entire data stored in Device42. If that could be customizable, it would be good. We should be allowed to add our own columns to that by writing a script or something like that. There should be an option to add or limit whatever we want."
"Mapping items wasn't as intuitive as importing in Device42, so this is an area for improvement."
"It was hard to know which assets I'd already looked at because if I looked up another asset with a similar name, they would still pop up. I would have to make sure I was looking at the right asset. The search function should be improved."
"The breadth and depth of the solution's discovery of IT asset information means the system does most of the work, but they need to work on improving the database discovery part, especially for Oracle Exadata."
"The product must provide AI features."
"Device42 is a main part of our processes. We need reliability, not only in terms of the data but with the solution itself. It's really difficult when we have 10 minutes of Device42 downtime because none of our teams can work for those 10 minutes, and it's more time lost if there is longer downtime. An improvement would be to have a cluster implementation of Device42 to have high-availability and ensure that we don't have downtime in case of failure."
"In general, JIRA has no relation to customers or financials. Therefore, marketplace add-ons are needed to make it work for customer-facing systems."
"If JIRA were more of a substantial stand-alone product that covered more needs for project management, we wouldn't be using a suite of products."
"The product does not have the capability to sort queued tickets by product. This would be useful in making workflows more efficient."
"SaaS version for large organizations (more than 2000 users) is not available."
"The deployment can be a bit complex, especially for those who are not technical."
"We have a lot of add-ons, however, instead of the add-ons, for example, cloning could be better."
"In the Turkish market, the biggest problem is that they are looking for a server type of solution, but when it comes to Jira Service Management, Atlassian is a remote type of license. There are just two different options, data center and cloud."
"It would be better if it had capabilities to connect to mobile applications (e.g., Whatsapp)"
Device42 is ranked 6th in IT Asset Management with 25 reviews while JIRA Service Management is ranked 2nd in IT Service Management (ITSM) with 73 reviews. Device42 is rated 8.4, while JIRA Service Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Device42 writes "Good reporting and discovery capabilities, and helpful for understanding device dependencies and asset management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JIRA Service Management writes "Customizable, stable, and integrates well". Device42 is most compared with ServiceNow, ServiceNow CMDB, Infoblox IPAM, BMC Helix Discovery and Lansweeper, whereas JIRA Service Management is most compared with ServiceNow, ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus, Freshdesk, BMC Helix ITSM and OpenText Service Management Automation X (SMAX).
We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.