We performed a comparison between Digital.ai Continuous Testing and LambdaTest based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools."Experitest is one of the only companies to offer a real device on the cloud to perform testing. They also provide quality documentations that help you navigate and maximize the solution."
"The most valuable part of Experitest is the number of real devices on which the test is run."
"Stability-wise, I have not experienced any downtime or other performance issues."
"LambdaTest offers geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!"
"The slow nature of a cloud platform was compensated with parallel testing, and now we are able to finish our testing job faster than it was before COVID."
"Builds that took days to complete with in-house infrastructure were executed in a couple of hours."
"The UI is pretty clean and easy to navigate, and we were able to figure it out very quickly."
"The real devices feature is the most valuable feature for us."
"Without a doubt, LambdaTest is one of the big reasons behind our faster deployment and better team collaboration."
"We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring."
"I would also like to see more videos and descriptions that could make installation more efficient."
"I have been automating tests for many years on many things but not on mobile devices. The amount of time that I have spent on just figuring out how to use Experitest and get it to work was quite long compared to what I have been doing before. I spent the first two weeks just getting it started. It would be good to have some video explanation of how to use it on your devices and get started. Their online documentation is quite good and extensive, but it would be quite good to have some end-to-end examples demonstrated."
"Load flow compared to other stacks needs improvement."
"I've also had some issues with the speed of certain API calls and the rendering of data. For example, when I'm onboarding data, the process can be slow."
"Mobile application testing will be an added benefit for us if LambdaTest implements this really soon."
"I would like to see all of the features available in the freemium plan so that I can test them."
"Their smart testing module needs improvement."
"I feel that the automated screenshot testing takes a little longer on MacOS sometimes."
"The scalability is good with Amazon, but IBM had some issues."
"You cannot perform native-app testing, as they offer simulation for web testing only."
More Digital.ai Continuous Testing Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Digital.ai Continuous Testing is ranked 28th in Test Automation Tools while LambdaTest is ranked 14th in Test Automation Tools with 19 reviews. Digital.ai Continuous Testing is rated 6.6, while LambdaTest is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Digital.ai Continuous Testing writes "Useful for running tests on many different types of real devices but requires some end-to-end video examples to get started quickly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LambdaTest writes "Cost-effective, good integration, and parallel testing leads to good performance". Digital.ai Continuous Testing is most compared with Perfecto, Tricentis Tosca, Sauce Labs and Katalon Studio, whereas LambdaTest is most compared with BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, Katalon Studio, Tricentis Tosca and Testsigma.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
