"It's a product with a swarm of different applications, each one answers the needs of a specific part of the business. They collaborate one with each other relatively smoothly."
"EMC's documentation team has put a lot of effort into its literature, and the documentation and installation guides are simply superb."
"The ability to add metadata and use that to categorize information is a valuable feature of OpenText Extended ECM."
"An SAP user can store documents directly into OpenText without a connector."
"The tool's most valuable features are document storage, security, and compliance."
"We use Core Share to share documents with external auditors or with vendors, and that prevents them from being able to get into the whole system. It is useful."
"Being able to tag metadata on documents and being able to have different workspaces in there for our documents is valuable. We do loan documents, and different types of documents have different types of retentions. We are able to categorize based on that, and we are able to do tag searching to find what we are looking for."
"Most of our customers are very fond of the upgraded smart user interface."
"Retention is useful. I have been pleased with the search functionality and the extensibility for tying it into integrations with other systems and building workflows on top of it."
"We can configure the solution with any industry's products per customer requirements."
"I would say scalability is a hot point to improve."
"The main work to do concerns cloud integration because our customers want to go to the cloud."
"When it comes to addressing complex use cases, three or four years ago, we ended up purchasing an additional OpenText product called AppWorks because we started to run into some limitations with the workflow that can be done in Extended ECM. It was a little limiting, so we ended up getting another product."
"The architecture needs improvement, as it's complex."
"I have not used it enough to start running into issues. Some of my technical guys could name a couple of things, but in terms of support, we did have challenges getting good responses from them."
"OpenText Extended ECM's user interface could be improved."
"There are no additional features that I would like to see. I am pretty happy with it, but their support could be a bit better."
"We had some issues with scalability in the production. So, I would rate it a five out of ten."
"User interface needs improvement (at least in the version we are using, desktop client)."
"The solution's performance, stability, and consistency could be improved."
More Documentum Digital Asset Manager [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Documentum Digital Asset Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Digital Asset Management while OpenText Extended ECM is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 18 reviews. Documentum Digital Asset Manager [EOL] is rated 7.6, while OpenText Extended ECM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Documentum Digital Asset Manager [EOL] writes "A swarm of applications for varying business demands, but scalability needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Extended ECM writes "Serves as a single source of support for the company but has scalability issues". Documentum Digital Asset Manager [EOL] is most compared with Aprimo, whereas OpenText Extended ECM is most compared with OpenText Documentum, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and Alfresco.
We monitor all Digital Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.