We performed a comparison between Dynatrace and Falcon LogScale based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management."We can see each session, end-to-end, and discover issues."
"Dynatrace has great training available. It is easy for everybody to use. Anybody can go out to YouTube, watch a video, and figure out how to use the piece that they need."
"The stuff that's coming with the new pieces around the Dynatrace Managed SaaS implementation. The ease of implementation there is significant. We've spent a lot of time with AppMon and DC RUM - that's a lot of time to set up, configure. With Managed solution, you just drop it in and everything pretty much auto-instruments."
"You can see every step a transaction goes through, which servers it hits, and what technology it uses."
"Agentless Transaction Analysis allows my team to granularly decompose complex operations and flows for business applications."
"Integration with other tools in company using SNMP traps."
"I like the PurePaths dashlet the most. This is mostly because as soon I open the PurePaths dashlet and sort by response time, there is the problem. Every time."
"Ease of problem detection and alerting, visual timeline, and user-sessions are some of the best features of Dynatrace."
"It offers the capability to view live log ingestion directly from the console which means you can seamlessly manage live log data ingestion alongside accessing and analyzing older data from the past."
"UEM (User Experience Management) works great for web clients and Android and IOS apps, but for other rich clients it's a lot more challenging."
"If you want to see a month's data, it keeps on spinning. Here is an improvement which needs to happen, which is the case with all applications or tools. There is a lot of data, and either we have to change the way we are logging or the application needs to be enhanced."
"In AppMon, the performance could be improved. That is the one thing I am most interested in."
"Enterprise Synthetic of DC RUM can be made more robust."
"It is necessary to improve the integration with the product, Oracle Siebel."
"The dashboard tool needs to be improved. We need more options, because the look and feel is too old-fashioned."
"There continues to be some opportunity to expose the infrastructure from a broader reporting standpoint. Overall, the opportunity is in the reporting capability and the ability to more flexibly expose or pivot the data for deeper analysis. Oftentimes, the solution is good at looking narrowly at information, but when you want to broaden that perspective, that's where the challenges come in. At this point, it requires the export of data to external systems to do this."
"The business use case is that most people want to see how many orders came in. I'd like to be able to get data out of JavaScript tags, and capture more data. I think that would make it much more useful, rather than using Google Analytics. Instead, have one tool to capture all the stack, that would make it easy."
"There are some overlapping features found in multiple tools."
Dynatrace is ranked 4th in Log Management with 341 reviews while Falcon LogScale is ranked 34th in Log Management with 1 review. Dynatrace is rated 8.8, while Falcon LogScale is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Dynatrace writes "AI identifies all the components of a response-time issue or failure, hugely benefiting our triage efforts". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Falcon LogScale writes "A highly commendable and robust solution offering powerful features and comprehensive log data management". Dynatrace is most compared with Datadog, New Relic, AppDynamics, Splunk Enterprise Security and Azure Monitor, whereas Falcon LogScale is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Elastic Stack, Grafana Loki, LogRhythm SIEM and Logpoint.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
