We performed a comparison between Elastic Search and Lucidworks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Indexing and Search solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It provides deep visibility into your cloud and distributed applications, from microservices to serverless architectures. It quickly identifies and resolves the root causes of issues, like gaining visibility into all the cloud-based and on-prem applications."
"It's a stable solution and we have not had any issues."
"The search speed is most valuable and important."
"The most valuable features are the detection and correlation features."
"Helps us to store the data in key value pairs and, based on that, we can produce visualisations in Kibana."
"Data indexing of historical data is the most beneficial feature of the product."
"The most valuable feature is the out of the box Kibana."
"There's lots of processing power. You can actually just add machines to get more performance if you need to. It's pretty flexible and very easy to add another log. It's not like 'oh, no, it's going to be so much extra data'. That's not a problem for the machine. It can handle it."
"Provides the ability to control how indexing and searching perform and controls how the scoring for search results is done, letting you customize the search experience according to your needs."
"The valuable features are automation and multiple connectors available out of the box. It is simple to manage and easier to use for all users."
"Elastic Enterprise Search can improve by adding some kind of search that can be used out of the box without too much struggle with configuration. With every kind of search engine, there is some kind of special function that you need to do. A simple out-of-the-box search would be useful."
"Elastic Search could benefit from a more user-friendly onboarding process for beginners."
"The pricing of this product needs to be more clear because I cannot understand it when I review the website."
"The solution has quite a steep learning curve. The usability and general user-friendliness could be improved. However, that is kind of typical with products that have a lot of flexibility, or a lot of capabilities. Sometimes having more choices makes things more complex. It makes it difficult to configure it, though. It's kind of a bitter pill that you have to swallow in the beginning and you really have to get through it."
"Elastic Enterprise Search could improve the report templates."
"This product could be improved with additional security, and the addition of support for machine learning devices."
"The UI point of view is not very powerful because it is dependent on Kibana."
"It is hard to learn and understand because it is a very big platform. This is the main reason why we still have nothing in production. We have to learn some things before we get there."
"Having some kind of prebuilt client UI will be helpful."
"The solution could improve by adding more AI and natural language processing."
Earn 20 points
Elastic Search is ranked 1st in Indexing and Search with 59 reviews while Lucidworks is ranked 8th in Indexing and Search. Elastic Search is rated 8.2, while Lucidworks is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Elastic Search writes "Played a crucial role in enhancing our cybersecurity efforts ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Lucidworks writes "Provides the ability to control how indexing and searching perform". Elastic Search is most compared with Faiss, Milvus, Pinecone and Azure Search, whereas Lucidworks is most compared with Coveo. See our Elastic Search vs. Lucidworks report.
See our list of best Indexing and Search vendors.
We monitor all Indexing and Search reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
