Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager vs erwin Data Intelligence by Quest comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between erwin Data Intelligence by Quest and Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Governance solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager vs. erwin Data Intelligence by Quest Report (Updated: March 2024).
770,458 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Data Intelligence creates a single source of truth for all of our metadata. This solution is better for data warehousing, but the metadata features speed up our development work. It's easy to create and manage mappings because we can export them to Informatica and pick up the work where we left off.""erwin has tremendous capabilities to map right from the business technologies to the endpoint, such as physical entities and physical attributes, from a lineage standpoint.""The data mapping manager is the most valuable feature.""Data Intelligence has provided more profound insights into legacy data movements, lineages, and definitions in the short term. We have linked three critical layers of data, providing us with an end-to-end lineage at the column level.""Data Intelligence allows us to automate multiple tasks we had previously done manually, such as restructuring the metadata for our purposes, setting up ETL flows, and defining the data tables we create. It also enables us to standardize our approach and our technical processes.""Mind map... is a really good feature because it is very helpful in seeing which column's tables are related. Also, you can flag them with "sensitive data" and other indicators. You can also customize your own features for the mind map. That was another very robust feature.""It is a central place for everybody to start any ETL data pipeline builds. This tool is being heavily used, plus it's heavily integrated with all the ETL data pipeline design and build processes. Nobody can bypass these processes and do something without going through this tool.""They have just the most marvelous reports called mind maps, where whatever you are focused on sits in the middle. They have this wonderful graphic spiderweb that spreads out from there where you can see this thing mapped to other logical bits or physical bits and who's the steward of it. It's very cool and available to your business teams through a portal."

More erwin Data Intelligence by Quest Pros →

"We move data between clouds and also from on-premises to the cloud. There is no other mechanism to check if this data is moving according to industry standards for such things as security, bandwidth, and SSL encryption mechanism. We would not be able to see these metrics without Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager.""Purview delivers data protection across multi-cloud and multi-platform environments.""We have more visibility of data and how it is being shared."

More Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager Pros →

Cons
"The technical support could be improved.""The versioning can sometimes be confusing because we use the publishing feature for the mapping. Technical analysts sometimes have two versions, and they should know that the public version is the correct one.""Another area where it can improve is by having BB-Graph-type databases where relationship discovery and relationship identification are much easier.""One big improvement we would like to see would be the workflow integration of codeset mapping with the erwin source to target mapping. That's a bit clunky for us. The two often seem to be in conflict with one another. Codeset mappings that are used within the source to target mappings are difficult to manage because they get locked.""There is room for improvement with the data cataloging capability. Right now, there is a list of a lot of sources that they can catalog, or they can create metadata upon, but if they can add more then that would be a good plus for this tool.""The SDK behind this entire product needs improvement. The company really should focus more on this because we were finding some inconsistencies on the LDK level. Everything worked fine from the UI perspective, but when we started doing some deep automation scripts going through multiple API calls inside the tool, then only some pieces of it work or it would not return the exact data it was supposed to do.""There are a lot of little things like moving between read screens and edit screens. Those little human interface type of programming pieces will need to mature a bit to make it easier to get to where you want to go to put the stuff in.""The data quality assessment requires third-party components and a separate license."

More erwin Data Intelligence by Quest Cons →

"We'd like to see the solution expanded to include firewalls and endpoints.""One area for improvement is the technical support for Purview. With all the other solutions from Microsoft we get really good technical support, but with Purview we had a compliance error and we couldn't find the solution. Purview would not point us to the correct solution, it just indicated the error. We had to troubleshoot it and find out what led to this error. We contacted technical support but it took them one week to identify the root cause of the error.""We've had issues with data connectors for Teams."

More Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The licensing cost is around $7,000 for user. This is an estimation."
  • "There is an additional fee for the server maintenance."
  • "The whole suite, not just the DI but the modeling software, the harvester, Mapping Manager — everything we have — is about $100,000 a year for our renewals. That works out to each module being something like $8,000 to $10,000."
  • "erwin's pricing was cheaper than its competitors."
  • "You buy a seat license for your portal. We have 100 seats for the portal, then you buy just the development licenses for the people who are going to put the data in."
  • "erwin is cheaper than other solutions and this should appeal to other buyers. It has a good price tag."
  • "We operate on a yearly subscription and because it is an enterprise license we only have one. It is not dependent on the number of users."
  • "Smart Data Connectors have some costs, and then there are user-based licenses. We spend roughly $150,000 per year on the solution. It is a yearly subscription license that basically includes the cost for Smart Data Connectors and user-based licenses. We have around 30 data stewards who maintain definitions, and then we have five IT users who basically maintain the overall solution. It is not a SaaS kind of operation, and there is an infrastructure cost to host this solution, which is our regular AWS hosting cost."
  • More erwin Data Intelligence by Quest Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing and licensing are moderate because we have other licenses for Microsoft services. The pricing is in line with that."
  • More Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.
    770,458 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The data mapping manager is the most valuable feature.
    Top Answer:The data quality assessment requires third-party components and a separate license. I would like to have better integration around the data quality. I would appreciate the inclusion of a… more »
    Top Answer:We have more visibility of data and how it is being shared.
    Top Answer:I'm not sure of the exact pricing of the solution. It's cheaper than our previous option. The cost is not much of an issue at the moment.
    Ranking
    4th
    out of 57 in Data Governance
    Views
    4,864
    Comparisons
    1,457
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    1,311
    Rating
    8.4
    11th
    out of 57 in Data Governance
    Views
    931
    Comparisons
    741
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    1,128
    Rating
    9.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    erwin DG, erwin Data Governance
    Microsoft Compliance Manager
    Learn More
    Overview

    The erwin Data Intelligence Suite (erwin DI) combines data catalog and data literacy capabilities for greater awareness of and access to available data assets, guidance on their use, and guardrails to ensure data policies and best practices are followed. Automatically harvest, transform and feed metadata from a wide array of data sources, operational processes, business applications and data models into a central data catalog. Then make it accessible and understandable within context via role-based views. This complete metadata-driven approach to data governance facilitates greater IT and business collaboration.

    Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager is a feature in the Microsoft 365 compliance center that helps you manage your organization’s compliance requirements with greater ease and convenience. Compliance Manager can help you throughout your compliance journey, from taking inventory of your data protection risks to managing the complexities of implementing controls, staying current with regulations and certifications, and reporting to auditors.

    To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.

    Sample Customers
    Oracle, Infosys, GSK, Toyota Motor Sales, HSBC
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Insurance Company28%
    Pharma/Biotech Company22%
    Computer Software Company22%
    Healthcare Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Government10%
    Insurance Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Government7%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business5%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise74%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager vs. erwin Data Intelligence by Quest
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager vs. erwin Data Intelligence by Quest and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    770,458 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    erwin Data Intelligence by Quest is ranked 4th in Data Governance with 18 reviews while Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager is ranked 11th in Data Governance with 3 reviews. erwin Data Intelligence by Quest is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of erwin Data Intelligence by Quest writes "Enabled us to centralize a tremendous amount of data into a common standard, and uniform reporting has decreased report requests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager writes "Really good encryption mechanism prevents man-in-the-middle and other types of attacks". erwin Data Intelligence by Quest is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Governance, Collibra Governance, Alation Data Catalog and Informatica Axon, whereas Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager is most compared with Microsoft Defender XDR, Microsoft Purview Data Governance, OneTrust DataGovernance and Microsoft Defender for Cloud. See our Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager vs. erwin Data Intelligence by Quest report.

    See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

    We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.