ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs Fortinet FortiSIEM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations and Fortinet FortiSIEM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two IT Operations Analytics solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. Fortinet FortiSIEM Report (Updated: May 2020).
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable features are security detections, perimeter detection, dashboards, and alerts.""Wire data analytics.""There are many valuable features in this product, but probably the biggest is the customization capability it has.""The most valuable feature is the way it handles data, from Layer 2 up to Layer 7. We can see everything that happens in the network.""This solution is more applications reference architecture focused. Its benefit is that it specializes in that space.""Not only can you look at the protocol import level. It also has a live PCAP analysis."

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Pros →

"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiSIEM are the SD-WAN, Global LAN, and application controls.""It's a very nice solution to work with.""FortiSIEM's log correlation is good.""This solution offers extensive customization options, making it possible to adapt it precisely to their requirements.""Fortinet FortiSIEM has its own validated and authentic IP database that marks malicious IP attacks against the firewall and generates an alert for the same.""The primary valuable feature is that it has replaced a whole lot of other products with one platform.""FortiSIEM is a great tool for making security processes transparent.""The ability to write my own parsers for the devices that are not supported by Fortinet is the most valuable feature."

More Fortinet FortiSIEM Pros →

Cons
"They either have to go broad or decide what their bread and butter is and get really good at that.""I would improve the Rule-Based Access Control (RBAC) by providing granular access control to the data.""This solution would be improved if it had the ability to retain data longer.""Network visibility is something that needs to be improved.""We'd like to see a local presence within the region in order to have seamless service whether it's the support, the implementation, or professional services.""They have a new solution, ExtraHop Reveal(x), and I think it needs improvement."

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Cons →

"An improvement would be if FortiSIEM's licensing was based on the number of nodes rather than the EPS.""If there is a configuration on the wrong side of the network or there are changes that result in harm to our IT infrastructure, the solution should immediately fix it.""With FortiSIEM, the issue has to do with the ways we can generate a report. It's not as flexible compared to that with other SIEM tools, like Splunk.""Fortinet FortiSIEM could improve to extend to several locations or sites.""The solution needs to do a better job with third party integration. Right now, that's lacking on the solution. I specifically am talking about the AWS environment. Most of the AWS environment products do not have that capability to integrate.""When compared with some competitors, in terms of performance, the CPU and RAM requirements and the capability of coordination with development all need some improvement.""The support of the product changed recently, and I don't think it's for the better. They should work to improve the support they offer to clients.""It's difficult to integrate unsupported devices with FortiSIEM compared to QRadar. It's easier to integrate and develop processes in QRadar. It's harder to develop a custom process in FortiSIEM."

More Fortinet FortiSIEM Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing is fair considering the value provided."
  • "The pricing is higher than other solutions, but with such good features, I think it's worth it."
  • "The price of this solution for our environment is about £650,000 ($855,000 USD) for three years."
  • More ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Please be cheaper and more simplified."
  • "We bought the perpetual license, so we own the product, but there is a three-year support renewal fee for that."
  • "Pricing is acceptable for more than 90% of our customers, as they normally get discounts."
  • "Its price can be better. We are Fortinet partners, so we can get discounts, but its price can be an issue at the beginning for others. There is a licensing scheme for every case. There are three licensing schemes that we can choose from."
  • "The price of Fortinet FortiSIEM is a lot less when compared to other solutions."
  • "They have a yearly subscription."
  • "The solution is available for both, perpetual and subscription licenses."
  • "Manageable, however would be better as pay as you go versus CapEX."
  • More Fortinet FortiSIEM Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Operations Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:This solution is more applications reference architecture focused. Its benefit is that it specializes in that space.
    Top Answer:The pricing is somewhere in the middle. I't not cheap or expensive.
    Top Answer:What they can improve would be building a broader reach in terms of capabilities. At the same time, there are other tools on the market that could augment their offering. They either have to go broad… more »
    Top Answer:Real-time monitoring makes life quite easy for me.
    Top Answer:The price is competitive. We can scale based on the licensing. It is an annual CapEx.
    Top Answer:Network detection and response is a separate product. That's how I ended up with Wazuh. I'm looking for something to help me on the network and endpoint level. The vendor must look to consolidate and… more »
    Ranking
    8th
    Views
    373
    Comparisons
    182
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    725
    Rating
    7.0
    Views
    7,231
    Comparisons
    3,991
    Reviews
    22
    Average Words per Review
    439
    Rating
    7.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    FortiSIEM, AccelOps
    Learn More
    Overview

    The ExtraHop Application Performance Management Solution Delivers Unified Visibility Across the IT Environment w/ Proactive Alerts & Accelerated Troubleshooting

    FortiSIEM (formerly AccelOps 4) provides an actionable security intelligence platform to monitor security, performance and compliance through a single pane of glass.

    Companies around the world use FortiSIEM for the following use cases:

    • Threat management and intelligence that provide situational awareness and anomaly detection
    • Alleviating compliance mandate concerns for PCI, HIPAA and SOX
    • Managing “alert overload”
    • Handling the “too many tools” reporting issue
    • Addressing the MSPs/MSSPs pain of meeting service level agreements
    Sample Customers
    Alaska Airlines, bet365, Concur, McKesson, Microsoft, Morgan Stanley, Practice Fusion, Seattle Children's Hospital, Steward Health Care System
    FortiSIEM has hundreds of customers worldwide in markets including managed services, technology, financial services, healthcare, and government. Customers include Aruba Networks, Compushare, Port of San Diego, Cleveland Indians, Infoblox, Healthways, and Referentia.
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization50%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Computer Software Company7%
    Government4%
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider22%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Media Company10%
    Computer Software Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Government9%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise55%
    Large Enterprise35%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business42%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise33%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise53%
    Buyer's Guide
    ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. Fortinet FortiSIEM
    May 2020
    Find out what your peers are saying about ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. Fortinet FortiSIEM and other solutions. Updated: May 2020.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations is ranked 8th in IT Operations Analytics with 8 reviews while Fortinet FortiSIEM is ranked 9th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 64 reviews. ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations is rated 8.6, while Fortinet FortiSIEM is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations writes "Great for identifying application interdependencies with helpful support but needs better visualizations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiSIEM writes "It's cheaper than other solutions with the same features but lacks integration with many third-party vendors". ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations is most compared with NETSCOUT nGeniusONE, ThousandEyes, vRealize Network Insight and SolarWinds NPM, whereas Fortinet FortiSIEM is most compared with IBM Security QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh and LogRhythm SIEM. See our ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. Fortinet FortiSIEM report.

    We monitor all IT Operations Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.