We performed a comparison between ExtremeControl and Fortinet FortiNAC based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Access Control (NAC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The company also uses Cisco ISE in other places. I have been told that ExtremeControl is easier to use than ISE. The other reason we prefer ExtremeControl is stability. That's why they chose it for this big hospital in Oslo."
"There is information on migrating most of the cloud system's features."
"It has effectively enhanced network security and integrated with other security tools to streamline operations."
"The solution is easy to use."
"I can know which end users are using which features."
"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiNAC are user device management and there are plenty of policies."
"Fortinet FortiNAC is both scalable and stable."
"Fortinet FortiNAC offers several valuable features, including data security, 99 percent uptime with VPN connections, MAC filtering, and traffic prioritization."
"The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiNAC is its integration with all other Fortinet solutions."
"All the features of Fortinet FortiNAC are valuable."
"With FortiNAC, we don't need to configure the mass client site or access points. For example, we don't need to configure the switching site for a client's site. With Persistent Agent, it makes it much easier."
"It is a good product."
"The most valuable features are usability and security."
"One improvement could be better clarification, namely that the system only works optimally with all components purchased together."
"I'd like to have access to more information on the traffic passing through."
"The installation is easy, it can take between five minutes to four hours depending on the complexity of the environment. The speed of the installation could improve for more complex environments."
"There isn't enough development for the on-premises controller."
"The GUI in Fortinet FortiNAC could improve."
"The reporting capability needs to be improved."
"For our organization and our clients, the price is the main concern. They should work to make it more competitive."
"Technical support could improve their response times."
"Our users have been asking for simpler documentation and training materials to facilitate the deployment process."
"Admin UI could be better matched and easier to use; it cannot work as a RADIUS server."
"The automation in Fortinet FortiNAC could improve."
"The course content could be improved, it's not that simple to work through."
ExtremeControl is ranked 14th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 5 reviews while Fortinet FortiNAC is ranked 4th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 43 reviews. ExtremeControl is rated 7.2, while Fortinet FortiNAC is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of ExtremeControl writes "Has a simple setup process, but it could be affordable ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiNAC writes "I like the solution's native integration with other devices from the same vendor". ExtremeControl is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Forescout Platform and Sophos Network Access Control, whereas Fortinet FortiNAC is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Forescout Platform, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and macmon Network Access Control. See our ExtremeControl vs. Fortinet FortiNAC report.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.