We performed a comparison between Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and Trellix DLP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Technical support has been helpful."
"It's fast and it prepares loss reports."
"Forcepoint has been the leader in the space for many years and they, are very well established, and mature."
"The most valuable feature is security."
"The solution offers very good sensitive data protection."
"I like that you can quickly create policies and enforce them in a matter of minutes."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is that it captures where the data is being moved."
"The scalability is fantastic. One of the things that I like about Forcepoint is that I can customize the solution to suit my objectives."
"It prevents enterprises from installing external software and devices and can block specific network pathways."
"The tool has prebuilt templates for data classification. It is easier for customers to get started."
"Trellix can transfer the data through the cloud. The storage device control is an important feature."
"Scalability is feasible since it's on-premises. It's easy to scale there."
"We faced some issues with the endpoint installation of the agent as it is not from a common ground."
"The support could improve Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention."
"With respect to the discovery component, the reports are very hard to interpret because they come out in an illogical format."
"The initial setup is a bit complex. You will need help from the peer support team in the configuration."
"The solution lacks sufficient customization."
"You have to monitor the solution all the time."
"There's zero Forcepoint presence in West Africa. Customers typically like having these things close to them. It would help if they had a presence here. Right now, Forcepoint West Africa has been administered from South Africa. Because of this, customers can't access premium support in our region."
"This solution has a tendency to provide false-positive results."
"Trellix needs to improve customer support."
"The whole UI of the server console installed on the standalone computers is hefty."
"In future releases, I would like to see like to see encryption available on the cloud-based version."
"Trellix is incompatible with Linux, and its DLP part is incompatible with Mac. Sometimes, it does not work on Windows, either."
More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is ranked 2nd in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 51 reviews while Trellix DLP is ranked 21st in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 4 reviews. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.0, while Trellix DLP is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention writes "DLP great for encryptions; tech support is quite helpful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix DLP writes "Comes in a single console: Emission, endpoint security, everything in one product, one agent". Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector and Varonis Platform, whereas Trellix DLP is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Varonis Platform, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector and Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP). See our Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. Trellix DLP report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.