We performed a comparison between Symantec Data Loss Prevention and Trellix DLP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution can easily scale."
"The most valuable feature of Symantec Data Loss Prevention is the ease of modification."
"The dashboard, management section, and reporting are good."
"For detection, it has a great algorithm. It can recognize ID numbers and everything that you put in a policy for the end-users. That is really great for us as an institution where we have sensitive data. It recognizes all the sensitive data when someone tries to transfer it or put in other data."
"What I like about Symantec Data Loss Prevention is the technical support it provides. It's good."
"The incident response options and reporting features are particularly strong, with the inclusion of Incident Classification Assessment (ICA) for integrated reporting."
"I like how I have the possibility to check different channels with the same policy set."
"I have found the most valuable feature to be partial enlisting."
"Trellix can transfer the data through the cloud. The storage device control is an important feature."
"The tool has prebuilt templates for data classification. It is easier for customers to get started."
"Scalability is feasible since it's on-premises. It's easy to scale there."
"It prevents enterprises from installing external software and devices and can block specific network pathways."
"We want a more proactive reporting structure."
"This product is very powerful but it is very complex, so making it simpler to use would be an improvement."
"Different departments should manage administration, reporting, normalization and incident management."
"Symantec Data Loss Prevention could improve by having better system resource management, cloud option, and more features."
"They need to expand the channels they check."
"It is very difficult to log in to create a support ticket because no one is available to support our queries."
"The one downside for Symantec is that, due to its transition from Symantec to Broadcom, there's been a lot of changes. I am based in the Philippines and we don't have a contact person locally for any Symantec."
"I would like to see changes to the analytics."
"Trellix is incompatible with Linux, and its DLP part is incompatible with Mac. Sometimes, it does not work on Windows, either."
"Trellix needs to improve customer support."
"The whole UI of the server console installed on the standalone computers is hefty."
"In future releases, I would like to see like to see encryption available on the cloud-based version."
More Symantec Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
Symantec Data Loss Prevention is ranked 3rd in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 53 reviews while Trellix DLP is ranked 21st in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 4 reviews. Symantec Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.0, while Trellix DLP is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Symantec Data Loss Prevention writes "Consitent, accurate, and simple". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix DLP writes "Comes in a single console: Emission, endpoint security, everything in one product, one agent". Symantec Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian, Zscaler DLP and Amazon Macie, whereas Trellix DLP is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Varonis Platform, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector and Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP). See our Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs. Trellix DLP report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.