We performed a comparison between Fortra Tripwire IP360 and Qualys VMDR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, SentinelOne and others in Vulnerability Management."It's become the pinnacle point for anything that enters the network or anything that's passing through to production to first be affected by IP360, hardened, and up to standard. For our integrity management, one was deployed in the bank about two years ago and that's still going to expand the usage and the product itself. That will go hand in hand with training and expanding the product as for where it's deployed."
"Tripwire IP360 is a very stable solution."
"We could manage our entire IP range with the solution."
"Intuitive and easy to use."
"The initial setup was good. We didn't have any problems with it."
"They also have threat detection which maps threats. There is a feed that comes from Qualys when a new vulnerability is found. It tells us which machines are infected with that vulnerability."
"I find the most valuable features are the continuous monitoring. Even on premises, there is constant monitoring."
"Monitors workstations and servers for vulnerabilities and creates reports."
"What I like about Qualys VM is the dashboard presentation. It's very good."
"The solution is easy to use."
"It is a stable solution."
"The reporting functions can use improvement. There is room for growth because reporting functions differ a lot depending on what you're going to output. It depends on whether it's for technical or senior management and how it's interpreted. There could be growth within the reporting functionality side."
"We need to dedicate time and resources to keep it running."
"I am not very impressed by the technical support."
"I would like to have CSPM, a continuous scan-like cloud added to the solution."
"Qualys VM's vulnerability scan could be improved, especially the number of CVE numbers it can manage at a time."
"Qualys VM's scanner doesn't pick up every vulnerability, so we have to use multiple scanners to cover that gap."
"Finding things in management can be quite difficult."
"They have integrated with other third parties, but it is still not viable."
"When tested on Zero day, there were errors."
"Qualys Container Security can improve the interface. It could be easier to navigate and be enriched."
"They should make it accessible for more operating systems."
Fortra Tripwire IP360 is ranked 39th in Vulnerability Management with 6 reviews while Qualys VMDR is ranked 3rd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 77 reviews. Fortra Tripwire IP360 is rated 7.0, while Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Fortra Tripwire IP360 writes "The solution helps users to manage their entire IP range, but it's unreliable and very expensive to maintain". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". Fortra Tripwire IP360 is most compared with Tenable Nessus, whereas Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
