"If somebody is using a kind of Squish as a regression testing tool, froglogic Coco Code Coverage can be used in parallel because these two particular products can communicate with one another."
"It's a great visibility tool for the developer team."
"The stability is very good for Sentry and in general works well."
"The product performs well."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to create and assign rules and give access to particular users."
"Great for capturing application performance metrics and error logs."
"The most valuable feature we have found with Sentry is the security that it provides."
"Its initial setup process is relatively straightforward."
"The solution is user-friendly."
"froglogic Coco Code Coverage could improve by adding more computer programing language, it would be better. It only covers four languages."
"Lacks user metric tracking and the ability to create more dashboards."
"I would like to have alert policies and alert conditions enhanced in the next release."
"The settings for an administrator are complex."
"The price could be lowered."
"Its debugging feature needs to be faster."
"It would be nice if the product provided a map showing the users’ geographic location."
"I would like to see a role registration feature added."
"The log centralization and analysis could be improved in Sentry."
Earn 20 points
froglogic Coco Code Coverage is ranked 6th in Debugging while Sentry is ranked 1st in Debugging with 11 reviews. froglogic Coco Code Coverage is rated 7.0, while Sentry is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of froglogic Coco Code Coverage writes "Integrates well, highly scalable, but more programming langue support needed". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sentry writes "An easy-to-use solution that has a good dashboard, performs well, and provides flexible pricing". froglogic Coco Code Coverage is most compared with , whereas Sentry is most compared with Azure Monitor, Grafana, Elastic Observability, New Relic and AWS X-Ray.
See our list of best Debugging vendors.
We monitor all Debugging reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.