We performed a comparison between Grafana and OmniPeek based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can write queries in different languages, which is beneficial for visualization."
"The product's initial setup phase was very easy."
"It integrates well with other solutions."
"Grafana's built-in integration with third-party tools, databases, and MQs is an amazing feature."
"The integration between Loki and Tempo is valuable."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the UI dashboard because we need to create a dashboard on Grafana to monitor our data."
"It provides a graphical representation and it's clear to see what's happening."
"The solution has good features."
"It's a solid piece of software. It's stable."
"The most valuable feature of OmniPeek is the ability to assign custom color codes to the different packets easily."
"I believe the most crucial feature of OmniPeek search is the ability to sniff packets based on channel switching."
"The most valuable feature is OmniPeek is user-friendly."
"The most valuable features are the voice bot, which checks the quality of service for voice, and the expert view that gives me insight on what and where to troubleshoot."
"The most valuable feature of OmniPeek was the ability it gave us to see the connection procedure."
"The service dashboard is very hard and needs improvement."
"We need different kinds of applications in our infrastructure to see information in Grafana."
"It can take a considerable amount of time to learn the graphs if a long duration is selected."
"The solution has room for improvement with a better API to help automate the construction of the dashboards easier."
"More dashboard is required, out-of-the-box, for OpenNMS."
"There is room for improvement when using multiple dashboards because they can become complicated to keep track of and use."
"If there was an issue on one node, we couldn't drill down and see all the issues on other nodes."
"The security needs to be improved, such as the capacity to add permissions on dashboards."
"I don't see a clear roadmap in the future for improving this software."
"I would like to see the saving feature improved. We have had issues if you do not save your progress then you have to start from the beginning."
"I am not using OmniPeek for automation, we only do manual testing. Automation testing is tedious to do. The automation should be more user-friendly. I have exposed some APIs but the usage is not user-friendly."
"Making it more clear on how to configure the filters, or really automating them, would be an improvement."
"The solution's automation has room for improvement."
"I would like to see the tool work in an open environment the same as how it does in a closed environment."
Grafana is ranked 6th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 38 reviews while OmniPeek is ranked 30th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 6 reviews. Grafana is rated 8.0, while OmniPeek is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Grafana writes "Agent-free with great dashboards and an active community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OmniPeek writes "Easy to identify packets, beneficial color assigning, and responsive support". Grafana is most compared with New Relic, Azure Monitor, Sentry, Dynatrace and Elastic Observability, whereas OmniPeek is most compared with LiveAction LiveNX, Colasoft Capsa, LogicMonitor, SolarWinds NPM and DX Performance Management. See our Grafana vs. OmniPeek report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.