We performed a comparison between Harness and TeamCity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation."It's a highly customizable DevOps tool."
"I have not yet implemented the remote build feature, but this will be a big plus. We want to be able to build legacy products on a build agent without developers needing to have obsolete tool sets installed on their local PC."
"TeamCity's GUI is nice."
"The integration is a valuable feature."
"One of the most beneficial features for us is the flexibility it offers in creating deployment steps tailored to different technologies."
"We would like to see better integration with other version controls, since we encountered difficulty when this we first attempted."
"Time to deployment has been reduced in situations where we want to deploy to production or deploy breaking changes."
"VCS Trigger: Provides excellent source control support."
"The flexibility of TeamCity allows it to fit in workflows that I have yet to imagine."
"There's also room for improvement in debugging pipeline issues, which can sometimes become complex."
"The UI for this solution could be improved. New users don't find it easy to navigate. The need some level of training to understand the ins and the outs."
"The upgrade process could be smoother. Upgrading major versions can often cause some pain."
"Their online documentation is fairly extensive, but sometimes you can end up navigating in circles to find answers. I would like them (or partner with someone) to provide training classes to help newcomers get things up and running more quickly."
"I need some more graphical design."
"Integrating with certain technologies posed challenges related to time and required support from the respective technology teams to ensure smooth integration with TeamCity."
"If there was more documentation that was easier to locate, it would be helpful for users."
"REST API support lacks many features in customization of builds, jobs, and settings."
"If TeamCity could create more out of the box solutions to make it more user friendly and create more use cases, that would be ideal."
Harness is ranked 12th in Build Automation with 1 review while TeamCity is ranked 6th in Build Automation with 25 reviews. Harness is rated 7.0, while TeamCity is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Harness writes "Provides a good graphical interface, but the initial setup process needs improvement ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamCity writes "Build management system used to successfully create full request tests and run security scans". Harness is most compared with Tekton, Jenkins, Bamboo, GitHub Actions and GitLab, whereas TeamCity is most compared with GitLab, CircleCI, Jenkins, Tekton and GitHub Actions.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
