We performed a comparison between HPE NonStop and HPE Synergy based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Blade Servers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Feature-wise, the most valuable one is the fact that it has 100 hundred percent uptime every year. Secondly, it is stable."
"The stability of HPE NonStop is good."
"We don't have any issues with the stability of HPE NonStop."
"It is first in class for composable infrastructure. It has the scalability that meets our future needs and the automation that builds into something that we are really looking forward to using."
"It's a fully integrated solution with OneView."
"OneView, as a single point, a single management tool, it makes me delirious. It's really nice."
"The most valuable features are the evolution of our existing HPE portfolio, the integration with our existing tool sets, and the enhanced capabilities that OneView bring."
"We like that the solution can be arranged for an all-in-one single pane of glass, something our customers find important."
"They're easy to swap and move around the datacenter, for sure. They don't occupy too much space for what they offer."
"Great data storage and very good for software defined solutions."
"I believe, compared to the C7000, it delivers a significant amount of innovation and flexibility,"
"It is not flexible...Not a lot of applications run on HPE NonStop."
"HPE NonStop could improve by having infrastructure management."
"It would be helpful if they brought the price down."
"The main challenge we faced was that when it was installed it just did not work. There were faulty components and it took weeks of troubleshooting to find the faulty components, get them replaced. Getting help from HPE was difficult. Nobody knew about the product. It was a brand-new product and people had not been trained on it. That part was not a great experience."
"I would like to see more nodes in a single chassis so we wouldn't have to purchase additional chassis."
"The solution should support Cisco or other vendor interconnect models."
"They were not so deep into integration with VMware."
"I would like the ability to take the storage tray that is in a chassis and share it out to multiple chassis, not just the servers within the same chassis. This would be more efficient with resources."
"It has been in the external integrations to other platforms that we have, which aren't HPE, where some of our challenges have been. I would like to see some integrations with non-HPE platforms."
"We haven't seen any ROI, and it hasn't reduced our cost of operations."
"The cost is quite high."
HPE NonStop is ranked 8th in Blade Servers with 12 reviews while HPE Synergy is ranked 1st in Blade Servers with 85 reviews. HPE NonStop is rated 8.8, while HPE Synergy is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of HPE NonStop writes "With a perfect record for uptime, the solution ensures a return on investment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE Synergy writes "Local hard drives are not needed for the i3S module that boots to any operating system". HPE NonStop is most compared with HPE Superdome X, Dell PowerEdge M, Fujitsu CX1000 and Oracle Sun 6000, whereas HPE Synergy is most compared with HPE BladeSystem, Dell PowerEdge M, Cisco UCS B-Series, HPE Apollo and HPE ProLiant DL Servers. See our HPE NonStop vs. HPE Synergy report.
See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.
We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
