We performed a comparison between HPE OneView and Nutanix Prism based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring."We could literally swap out a piece of hardware, slide one back into the chassis, and immediately - about three reboots later - it was identical. We didn't have to worry about configuring it, we didn't have to spend any time getting anything into place. It came back and it healed the environment almost immediately."
"OneView provides a single console, which is manageable without physical access."
"Gives us one platform to monitor and access or configure all the servers or the 3PAR, etc."
"We have the dashboard up on a big screen, and you can actually see when things go wrong or if there are any faults with any of the servers. The backup is automated as well, so the appliance is quite good."
"The template management makes the deployment of the firmware updates much faster."
"If you have a lot of devices, like we do, then you have to have one single pane of view, otherwise we lose too much time. So, we needed this type of solution."
"Provides the strongest support for automation."
"Profile templates: The ability to generate the profiles and lay them down so the servers are built consistently. I would say that's probably the biggest piece of it."
"I like the general usability for general configuration. It is sufficient for everyday operations."
"Since we began using Nutanix the performance for virtual desktops is much better."
"The recent life cycle management feature is really helpful to us. Before that, we had to do everything manually, but now it's like a one-stop shop. We can upgrade firmware and all of the software from there. Also, managing storage information and other hardware-related resources is easy using Prism."
"Nutanix Prism's dashboard is very simple, and you don't need much knowledge to use it."
"What I like the most are the self-healing and the ability to see everything at a glance, from metrics to the resiliency status of the hardware. As soon as you log in, that's what you see."
"It is stable and reliable."
"I don't know how to explain how much time and effort switching to Nutanix HCI has saved us. It's 80 percent more time-efficient and convenient than having to use multiple interfaces to deal with storage and compute in our hypervisor."
"I am very satisfied with the technical support."
"The solution's console can be improved by making it more user-friendly and adding the capability to filter the reports out using only the information required."
"The solution could add storage, integration services, and end-to-end support for Cisco switches or other competitor products."
"The interface is a bit bland. It does its job, but it could have a better interface."
"HPE OneView should be able to cover more device models apart from ProLiant and Synergy."
"Technical support is not very good. The engineers do not know a lot about the product, even when asked simplistic questions."
"We have a version 3 and a version 1.2, but the upgrade process from the 1.2 to the 3 is kind of an issue."
"The speed and performance of the solution are areas where the product lacks and needs improvement."
"Use it, but do not think it is going into the clouds, because it is not. There is room for improvement."
"Nutanix is a great product, but I won't say it is a data center product. If it could leverage or work with non-Nutanix infrastructure, it would be a total data center solution. Right now, with Prism Central, we can only manage Nutanix clusters."
"The process of converting and importing virtual machines to the Nutanix environment is quite complicated."
"There are no firewall policies."
"In the next release, I would like the ability to browse data stores."
"The three clusters we have at our remote offices are just one-node clusters. If there were an easier way to upgrade items such as the BIOS, SATA drives, the BMC, et cetera, on those, that would be helpful."
"The pricing could be improved."
"I would like to see the integration of native, one-click "open support ticket" functionality for errors generated by the system within Prism. Currently, we have to manually open a support ticket in a separate web browser and manually input the error information."
"Although this solution has very good analytics capabilities, it can be even more granular."
HPE OneView is ranked 17th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 80 reviews while Nutanix Prism is ranked 4th in Virtualization Management Tools with 57 reviews. HPE OneView is rated 8.0, while Nutanix Prism is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of HPE OneView writes "Provides firmware compliance and the ability to connect to iPO". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nutanix Prism writes "Having a centralized platform for infrastructure information has helped us with capacity planning". HPE OneView is most compared with Cisco Intersight, Dell CloudIQ, Zabbix, Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator and OpsRamp, whereas Nutanix Prism is most compared with VMware Aria Operations, Zabbix, Cisco UCS Manager, Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) and AppDynamics Server Monitoring.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
