HPE Synergy vs Pure Storage FlashBlade comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
4,628 views|3,351 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Pure Storage Logo
4,515 views|3,095 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HPE Synergy and Pure Storage FlashBlade based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers.
To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,063 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is really easy to use, because it's GUI-based. It is not command line based, like mainframes.""I like that it's suitable for virtualization. It's also stable and scalable. The newer version has a lot of memory, and you don't have to worry about updates.""Composability... We show our partners the value of composability and how it can meet their needs.""The most valuable features of this solution are the ease of management and the integration with OneView.""The Online firmware update for the virtual connects has minimized our downtime windows.""Technical support is excellent. They are very helpful.""We like that the solution can be arranged for an all-in-one single pane of glass, something our customers find important.""It's a bit easier to manage than the C7000s."

More HPE Synergy Pros →

"It's very easy-to-use.""The initial setup was straightforward. If you know how to plug in power and network you're pretty much qualified. They were on site to configure the network, the box to fit into our network architecture. Other than that, we self-managed from there.""The initial setup is pretty easy and simple.""The most valuable feature of this solution is performance.""Using this solution has made our backups more reliable.""Speed and ease of use are the two most valuable features.""The onboarding and integrated monitoring tools are pretty good.""It is very easy to use, and it is very fast."

More Pure Storage FlashBlade Pros →

Cons
"The speed in OneView and how it updates the entire configuration needs improvement. If they can do that, and it could be a little more clear on what impact different actions will have for certain things, that would be good.""The solution must concentrate on improving the product quality.""We had an issue during the initial setup with the 40 Gigabyte cards. They weren’t working, so we had to work really closely with HPE support to get them to work.""In the past, I have had issues with configurations.""The only good thing is that they have some powerful machines that you can use, such as the latest generations of HPE Compute that you can use.""In the Generation 10 modules, we have observed that very often the server has hardware issues.""You can always improve some things.""​Because we're using 2012, we're having issues making templates."

More HPE Synergy Cons →

"I would like to see the licensing fees improved as well as the price per terabytes.""There is some room for new features related to authentication and integration with Kubernetes, and other solution using S3 Bucket.""The features provided for SMB customers are limited.""It would be beneficial if the layer could support the S3 protocol and be container ready in the next release.""On our dedupe during our initial buy, we were expecting a number a little higher like 4x. However, we are getting about 3.6. While it is close enough, it doesn't quite hit the numbers. So, this has been a challenge.""I would like to see better integration.""In the realm of micro-services, I think that Pure Storage can do well if they start getting in there and making their arrays more micro-services ready.""The solution is expensive."

More Pure Storage FlashBlade Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The Nutanix platform came in a little more expensive than the Synergy."
  • "The solution has reduced our IT infrastructure costs because we have had to buy less services than we used to."
  • "In our whole environment, the cost is in the millions. On this particular chassis, the annual cost is 12 blades times approximately $40,000."
  • "The biggest cost is the VMware licensing."
  • "We do a biannual renewal. I know how much that renewal is, but I don't know how much it breaks down to be just Synergy, since we have our VMware, all of our physical equipment, etc. all rolled up into one renewal, which is a little over $300,000 every two years. However, only a subset of that is the Synergy product."
  • "There was at least about a 20 percent savings in cost over our purchase based on the purchase price of the compute modules themselves versus what we've had to pay before. It was significantly less."
  • "Synergy has lowered our total cost of ownership significantly. I would say ballpark around 25 percent, maybe more."
  • "We bought everything outright to start with. We don't do much consumption-based stuff."
  • More HPE Synergy Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "We used a reseller for the purchase."
  • "Our customers have seen a reduction in TCO."
  • "I have seen ROI. It has allowed me to increase the density of my VMs without having to purchase anything additional."
  • "Our licensing is renewed annually."
  • "Support is a separate line item. Support is a different cost, but whatever your support is now, that's what you're going to pay forever. If your support's $100 today, six years from now it's $100. It doesn't fluctuate unless you upgrade it, or change it, etc."
  • "The price is a little high."
  • "In my opinion, we have paid the right price for the product. I don't think that it is too much or too little."
  • "The price of this solution could be made more affordable."
  • More Pure Storage FlashBlade Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
    771,063 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:For me, choosing between HPE’s Bladesystem and Synergy came down to which solution was more powerful, reliable, and stable. It turns out Bladesystem was the winner. Bladesystem is excellent because it… more »
    Top Answer:It is a good product for hypervisors.
    Top Answer:You have to propose Synergy with your customer base.
    Top Answer:The tool's most valuable feature is its fast performance, especially in handling snapshots. It helps during power outages when we need to quickly move data between different data centers. It ensures… more »
    Top Answer:Commvault has mainly driven the Analytics, providing data and reports. However, the product has room for improvement, especially regarding storage analytics. Upgrading firmware has caused issues… more »
    Ranking
    1st
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    4,628
    Comparisons
    3,351
    Reviews
    17
    Average Words per Review
    380
    Rating
    8.3
    6th
    Views
    4,515
    Comparisons
    3,095
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    384
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    HPE Synergy, the first platform built from the ground up for Composable Infrastructure, offers an experience that empowers IT to create and deliver new value instantly and continuously. It is a single infrastructure that reduces operational complexity for traditional workloads and increases operational velocity for the new breed of applications and services. Through a single interface, HPE Synergy composes physical and virtual compute, storage, and fabric pools into any configuration for any application. As an extensible platform, it easily enables a broad range of applications and operational models such as virtualization, hybrid cloud, and DevOps. With HPE Synergy, IT can become not just the internal service provider but the business partner to rapidly launch new applications that become the business.

    FlashBlade is the industry’s most advanced scale-out storage for unstructured data, powered by a modern, massively parallel architecture to consolidate complex data silos (like backup appliances and data lakes) and accelerate tomorrow’s discoveries and insights.

    Sample Customers
    HudsonAlpha, Virgin Media, EMIS, United
    ServiceNow, Mercedes-AMG Petronas Motorsport, Dominos, Man AHL
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Healthcare Company9%
    Retailer9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government8%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Manufacturing Company18%
    University12%
    Energy/Utilities Company12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization36%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise65%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise49%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise41%
    Large Enterprise45%
    Buyer's Guide
    Blade Servers
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: May 2024.
    771,063 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    HPE Synergy is ranked 1st in Blade Servers with 85 reviews while Pure Storage FlashBlade is ranked 6th in File and Object Storage with 31 reviews. HPE Synergy is rated 8.4, while Pure Storage FlashBlade is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of HPE Synergy writes "Local hard drives are not needed for the i3S module that boots to any operating system". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pure Storage FlashBlade writes "A high-performing and scalable solution that improves data performance for S3 workloads". HPE Synergy is most compared with HPE BladeSystem, Dell PowerEdge M, Cisco UCS B-Series, HPE Apollo and Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers, whereas Pure Storage FlashBlade is most compared with Dell PowerScale (Isilon), VAST Data, MinIO, Pure Storage FlashArray and Pure FlashArray X NVMe.

    We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.